Is problem solving an inborn skill?

  • Thread starter Thread starter navneet9431
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Iq Problem solving
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of problem-solving in academic contexts, particularly in subjects like physics and mathematics. Participants express feelings of frustration and self-doubt when unable to apply learned concepts to solve problems, often comparing themselves unfavorably to younger peers who seem to grasp these concepts more easily. The conversation highlights the interplay between innate ability and the importance of hard work, practice, and experience in developing problem-solving skills. While some believe that inborn aptitude plays a role, many emphasize that determination, consistent effort, and effective study strategies are crucial for improvement. The impact of IQ on problem-solving is debated, with some arguing that while it may provide an advantage, it is not the sole determinant of success. Participants encourage focusing on personal growth rather than comparisons with others, advocating for a mindset that values perseverance and learning from mistakes. Overall, the consensus is that both nature and nurture contribute to problem-solving abilities, and that hard work can lead to significant progress regardless of initial skill level.
  • #31
nawas another threet9431 said:
"How will you compare to someone who is not a clever and works hard?
...
You say some things we have no control over, what about your neurons in your brain do you have control over them? Their efficiency, number, synapses, neuro-transmitters?
Is the structure and efficiency of your brain less physical than your height?"

So does that literally mean i can't become smart like my those classmates who grab and solve questions quick!
No! There was another thread on something similar. Work hard you will get results
 
  • Like
Likes navneet9431
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
In my opinion, problem solving skills = domain knowledge + experience + intelligence
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #33
Yes its interesting.

Over two different threads we have been rehashing an age old argument, Nature verses Nurture. Which is it?

It is of course both in terms of learning concepts, acquiring and applying knowledge and we have been arguing mainly over what has the greater impact.

Where one puts the weighting is difficult because to understand that, one would have to have all the facts relating to how the brain stores then applies learned concepts.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint
  • #34
pinball1970 said:
Over two different threads we have been rehashing an age old argument, Nature verses Nurture. Which is it?
For me the most disturbing part about internet quarrels is that the participants often has some kind of urge to reach a final conclusion without even checking if it is possible or not.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint
  • #35
Rive said:
For me the most disturbing part about internet quarrels is that the participants often has some kind of urge to reach a final conclusion without even checking if it is possible or not.
The better word is "debate" instead of argue; but both words will work. Currently, this topic here is not hostile so it is not (yet) a hostile argument discussion.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #36
First keep in mind that those who you see as better problem solvers may be so not because they are more intelligent but because they worked hard at developing the necessary skills.

I have to believe that there is innate qualities that facilitate the process of problem solving. For example, problem solving is about seeing relationships. So a good memory to keep your attention on the various aspects of a problem so that you may more easily see the relationships. But effort s by far the the most important. That said here are four qualities of a good problem solver that have been proposed.

Knowledge of the area of the problem Learned through study
Develop a repertoire of techniques. Learned especially through practice.
Good management of the problem solving process, e.g.,knowing when to change approaches . Learned. again through practice.
Confidence that you can solve the problem. Learned. through successfully solving problems.

You might see where above is going, practice and working on problems until they are solved and learning from the experiences.

Leon Lederman ( Nobel Prize in Physics 1988) said "Hard work,--yes, it really accounts for a lot of success. Most scientists aren't brilliant. Some are even very slow. Being solid is important--that means really knowing what you have to know even if it takes a long time. Many "brilliant" guys are superficial. Determination, doggedness and hard work are the characteristics that are highly valued in a group. Imagination puts the icing on the cake."
 
  • Like
Likes navneet9431

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
98
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
774
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K