Is Proton Mass Really Reduced in Helium Nuclei?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mass reduction of protons in helium nuclei formed from deuterium fusion. It is established that when two deuterium nuclei fuse, the mass of the resulting helium nucleus does not equate to the sum of the individual nucleons' masses. Instead, the total mass of the nucleus is a property of the entire system, and the strong nuclear force and electrostatic force remain unchanged. The application of E=mc² is clarified, emphasizing that energy conservation is maintained throughout the fusion process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear fusion processes
  • Familiarity with the concepts of mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Knowledge of strong nuclear force and electrostatic force interactions
  • Basic grasp of particle physics terminology, including nucleons and rest mass
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of nuclear fusion and its implications in astrophysics
  • Study the concept of mass-energy equivalence in greater detail
  • Explore the role of strong nuclear force in atomic stability
  • Investigate the differences between rest mass and relativistic mass in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, nuclear scientists, and anyone interested in understanding the intricacies of nuclear fusion and mass-energy relationships in atomic structures.

avito009
Messages
184
Reaction score
4
I am no Einstein but I would like to expand my knowledge and share it.

When two deuterium atoms fuse together they become a helium nuclei. Now deuterium nuclei contains 1 proton and 1 neutron. When the deuterium nuclei fuses to form a helium nuclei. Helium nuclei contains 2 protons, and 2 neutrons. Now the mass of the proton in the deuterium nuclei is reduced. This means that the individual mass of the proton when it was in deuterium nuclei is greater than the mass of the proton in helium nuclei.

So here you may say that the mass difference of the proton would have caused a proportional increase in energy in the helium nuclei. If you believe in E= MC2. But in reality it is the opposite.

What actually happens is that when deuterium nuclei fuse the energy in the atom decreases and so there is a corresponding decrease in proton mass. This means that the strong nuclear force and the electrostatic force are less stronger in the fused nuclei. (Not the other way round).

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
avito009 said:
What actually happens is that when deuterium nuclei fuse the energy in the atom decreases and so there is a corresponding decrease in proton mass. This means that the strong nuclear force and the electrostatic force are less stronger in the fused nuclei. (Not the other way round).

I think the correct conclusion would be that what actually happens is that when deuterium nuclei fuse the energy in the atom increases and so there is a corresponding decrease in proton mass in the nuclei. This means that the strong nuclear force and the electrostatic force are more stronger in the fused nuclei. More energy lesser mass.

Is this proper?
 
You are discussing a topic which has a substantial number of books and general summaries around it. When fusion occurs, energetic particle(s) are ejected. Naturally, there is conservation of total mass/energy through each step. E=mc^2 does apply.

Not sure there are any general or popular misconceptions about this.
 
avito009 said:
I think the correct conclusion would be that what actually happens is that when deuterium nuclei fuse the energy in the atom increases and so there is a corresponding decrease in proton mass in the nuclei. This means that the strong nuclear force and the electrostatic force are more stronger in the fused nuclei. More energy lesser mass.

Is this proper?

No. The total mass of the nucleus is a property of the nucleus as a whole. You can't pick out the individual nucleons and assign them masses that will add to the total mass - all you can say is that one configuration of two neutrons and two protons has a different mass than another.
 
Another way to put it is that the mass of a system of particles does not generally equal the sum of the masses of the individual particles. (Here by "mass" I mean what physicists generally mean by "mass" nowadays, which is often called "rest mass" in popular literature and sometimes "invariant mass" by physicists; but not the "relativistic mass" that you often see in popular literature)
 
avito009 said:
This means that the strong nuclear force and the electrostatic force are less stronger in the fused nuclei. (Not the other way round).

Is this correct?

No, the strength of the forces involved does not change.
 
avito009 said:
I am no Einstein but I would like to expand my knowledge and share it.
...
If you believe in E= MC2. But in reality it is the opposite.

What actually happens is that...

This thread is pushing the edge of the rule about personal theories. Now that the underlying misconception has been explained by several posters, we should close it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K