Is Real Numbers an Ordered Field Under <?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ashok vardhan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Fields
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that real numbers are not an ordered field under the relation "<" but are indeed an ordered field under the relation "≤". The properties required for a relation to be considered an order include transitivity, antisymmetry, and totality. The confusion arises from the misunderstanding of the antisymmetric property, which does not hold for the "<" relation. Therefore, the correct assertion is that real numbers qualify as an ordered field under "≤".

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordered fields in mathematics
  • Familiarity with the properties of relations: transitivity, antisymmetry, and totality
  • Basic knowledge of real numbers and their properties
  • Concept of inequalities in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ordered fields in detail
  • Learn about the implications of antisymmetry in mathematical relations
  • Explore the differences between strict and non-strict inequalities
  • Investigate other examples of ordered fields beyond real numbers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the foundational properties of real numbers and ordered fields.

ashok vardhan
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Sir,i have read in wikipedia that for a relation to be ordered it should be transitive,antisymmetric,total...however we know that Real numbers is an ordered field under relation "<" but antisymmetric property is not valid with "<" relation..how is this justified..rectify me...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The real numbers are not an ordered field under <.
Rather, the real numbers are an ordered field under [itex]\leq[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
521
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K