Is Richard Dawkins a "recognized scientist"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter murshid_islam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Research
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the claim that Richard Dawkins is not a "recognized scientist," which sparked curiosity among forum members regarding his research contributions. Participants referenced Dawkins' Wikipedia page and suggested using Google Scholar for finding his research papers. The conversation highlighted the importance of independent research and the limitations of relying on social media comments as credible sources. Ultimately, the forum concluded that engaging in discussions based on unverified claims is unproductive.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Richard Dawkins' contributions to evolutionary biology
  • Familiarity with academic research databases like Google Scholar
  • Knowledge of how to evaluate scientific credentials
  • Basic skills in online research techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Richard Dawkins' published research papers through Google Scholar
  • Explore the significance of being an emeritus fellow at Oxford University
  • Learn how to critically assess claims made on social media platforms
  • Investigate the impact of public perception on scientific reputations
USEFUL FOR

Anyone interested in the intersection of science and public perception, including students, educators, and science communicators.

murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
Just saw a claim online that "Dawkins isn't a recognized scientist", which seemed like a strange claim. It made me wonder: how much research did Dawkins do over the years? Can you provide some references to his list of researches?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
murshid_islam said:
Can you provide some references to his list of researches?
Can you provide a link to this?
murshid_islam said:
Just saw a claim online that "Dawkins isn't a recognized scientist"
 
BillTre said:
Can you provide a link to this?
Unfortunately, it was a random facebook comment (which made me curious) that I noticed while scrolling. I don't have a link.
 
Did your curiosity drive you to do any searches on Richard Dawkins yourself?
What did you find?
 
BillTre said:
Did your curiosity drive you to do any searches on Richard Dawkins yourself?
What did you find?
I went to his Wikipedia page. It has a list of his published books. I wanted to see a list of his research papers. Any idea where I can find that?
 
murshid_islam said:
Can you provide some references to his list of researches?
You will save yourself time in the long run if you learn to search the web for this stuff yourself. Personally, I like google search, sometimes google scholar.

PF works better as a place to ask questions with explanations than as a forum for assigning tasks for volunteers to execute.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, phinds, Astronuc and 2 others
murshid_islam said:
I went to his Wikipedia page.
The fact that he is emeritus fellow at Oxford surely speaks to some high regard does it not? Not necessarilly to his scientific prowess I suppose, but what exactly prompts your question?
 
  • #10
I don't see how arguing by proxy with somebody not on PF will lead to anything. We say "He did A, B and C" and this person says "that doesn't really count". Then we say "He also did D, E and F" and they say "that doesn't count either." And so on.
 
  • #11
I was looking for an honest answeras to the motivation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
  • #12
murshid_islam said:
Unfortunately, it was a random facebook comment (which made me curious) that I noticed while scrolling. I don't have a link.
You are seriously trying to use a random Facebook comment to start a thread in the PF technical forums? This thread is done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander, phinds, jim mcnamara and 2 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
944
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K