How Did Apes Across the Globe Develop Similar Beliefs in a Creator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eggomaniac
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion explores the phenomenon of similar beliefs in a creator among various ape civilizations across the globe. Participants reference Richard Dawkins and Larry Krauss, discussing how different cultures developed deities despite geographical and temporal separations. The conversation highlights the intersection of science and philosophy, emphasizing that while science explains "how" phenomena occur, it does not address "why" they happen. The discussion concludes that understanding evolution and human psychology could provide insights into the origins of these beliefs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of evolutionary biology and natural selection
  • Familiarity with the works of Richard Dawkins and Larry Krauss
  • Basic knowledge of human psychology and cultural anthropology
  • Awareness of the philosophical distinctions between "how" and "why"
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of innate teleology in human cognition
  • Explore the role of cultural transmission in belief systems
  • Study the psychological underpinnings of religious beliefs
  • Investigate the implications of evolutionary theory on human thought and behavior
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for anthropologists, psychologists, philosophers, and anyone interested in the intersection of science and religion, particularly in understanding how similar belief systems emerged across different cultures.

  • #31
What do you mean "changed"?

Like "since today pi is 7"?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #32
Kglocc said:
I'm sorry, I've never heard of Goedel before, and I can't quite grasp what the wikipedia is trying to say about incompleteness theorem. But how does that, "not allow for infinity within the human mind"? Are you saying that Goedel somehow proved we cannot comprehend infinity with a proof? Even so, the concept of infinity may be impossible in the human mind, but actual infinity still exists (i.e. in math and physics) right?

Ah, no, I'm saying that the concept of "infinite imaginative" capacity is not what the theorem is about. That's a happy notion, but not one that's rooted in any science or math, so it just doesn't apply. In fact, there are other principles and theories which limit the capacity of the human mind, or the information content of any discrete entity.
 
  • #33
This thread has no relevance to to biology sub-forum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
4K