Is Rivasseau switching to agriculture?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter atyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Agriculture
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential shift of physicist Vincent Rivasseau towards agricultural applications, particularly in relation to quantum gravity and tensor models. Participants explore the implications of recent research on colored tensor models and their connections to both theoretical physics and practical applications in agriculture, such as growing melons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Rivasseau's move towards agriculture may stem from a desire to apply theoretical skills to real-world problems, such as growing melons.
  • There is a discussion about the structure of d-simplices and how they relate to the concept of "melons" in the context of tensor models.
  • One participant notes that the authors of a paper on colored tensor models appear to have unintentionally derived results related to dynamical triangulations, which may have implications for understanding quantum gravity.
  • Another participant mentions the potential connection between Rovellian spin foams and causal dynamical triangulations (CDT), suggesting that this could be a pathway for pure gravity theories.
  • Several posts delve into the specifics of differential sequencing in genomics, with participants discussing methods and applications without fully resolving the technical details.
  • Participants share links to relevant research papers that discuss critical behavior in group field theories and generalizations of the Virasoro algebra, indicating ongoing interest in the mathematical foundations of these theories.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus among participants. While some express curiosity about the implications of Rivasseau's work and its connections to agriculture, others focus on the technical aspects of tensor models and their applications in theoretical physics. The discussion includes multiple competing views and remains unresolved on several points.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the significance of certain mathematical results and their implications for both physics and agriculture. There are limitations in the understanding of the relationship between the discussed models and their practical applications, as well as the technical details surrounding differential sequencing.

atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,378
No more quantum gravity :smile: As we know strings and loops are both about condensed matter (AdS/CMT, tensor networks). So these guys want to apply their skills to real world problems too and grow melons. I think the back-up plan for the people who cloned the potassium channel, if the cloning didn't work out, was to sell melons. Well, the cloning did work, so Rivasseau will have to hope he gets other customers.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3122v1
Critical behavior of colored tensor models in the large N limit
Valentin Bonzom, Razvan Gurau, Aldo Riello, Vincent Rivasseau
(Submitted on 16 May 2011)
Abstract: Colored tensor models have been recently shown to admit a large N expansion, whose leading order encodes a sum over a class of colored triangulations of the D-sphere. The present paper investigates in details this leading order. We show that the relevant triangulations proliferate like a species of colored trees. The leading order is therefore summable and exhibits a critical behavior, independent of the dimension. A continuum limit is reached by tuning the coupling constant to its critical value while inserting an infinite number of pairs of D-simplices glued together in a specific way. We argue that the dominant triangulations are branched polymers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for spotting this. I was going to ask if anyone could explain it's significance but I see you already have :smile:

Correct me if I am wrong. A d-simplex has d+1 faces (e.g. a 2-simplex is a triangle with 3 sides) and a melon is what you get by taking two d-simplices and gluing them together on d of their d+1 faces.
So for example glue two triangles together along two sides each.


Each of the original simplices still has one face free, so a melon has two faces--that can attach to other stuff if desired. So you can for example string melons together in a melon-chain.
I can see how a chain of melons could branch...

Atyy or anybody want to summarize what this paper accomplishes or where it is going?
 
Last edited:
"The i.i.d. model is quite naturally interpreted as a model of dynamical triangulations (DT) [47–51]. In the reminder of this section we switch to notations more familiar in the DT literature."

"The authors are grateful to Jan Ambjørn for his explanations on branched polymers in matrix models and dynamical triangulations."

Looks like they analytically get the large volume limit of DT (by accident). In the conventional interpretation of the formalism, this a branched polymer phase with no smooth geometry (I think, just my quick reading).

This should be very interesting. I've always thought that if Rovellian spin foams are to work, they must link up with CDT, which I believe is the only indication so far that pure gravity could work (By Rovellian spin foam I mean quantum gravity without unification, since others working on spin foams are trying to get unification).
 
Hey you'd actually be surprised, the guys over in the agronomy department are doing some pretty deep stuff!

( <-- First "real" job was writing software for differential sequencing of corn genomes :P )
 
Last edited:
What is differential sequencing?
 
atyy said:
What is differential sequencing?

It refers to any of a number of methods of DNA sequencing where instead of sequencing the whole genome you take a similar organism with a fully sequenced genome and sequence the "differences". So say you want the genome for some strain of rice, instead of paying to sequence the whole thing you instead find a different strain of rice someone else has already sequenced and find some method for discovering just where and what the genetic differences between the two are, which since you already know the genome for #2 allows you to recover the genome for strain #1. I honestly don't know how commonplace this sort of thing is.

Sorry, didn't mean to threadjack :)
 
Coin said:
It refers to any of a number of methods of DNA sequencing where instead of sequencing the whole genome you take a similar organism with a fully sequenced genome and sequence the "differences". So say you want the genome for some strain of rice, instead of paying to sequence the whole thing you instead find a different strain of rice someone else has already sequenced and find some method for discovering just where and what the genetic differences between the two are, which since you already know the genome for #2 allows you to recover the genome for strain #1. I honestly don't know how commonplace this sort of thing is.

Sorry, didn't mean to threadjack :)

Is it done by hybridization to find common sequences, and lots of primers to get handles on the differential bits?
 
atyy said:
Is it done by hybridization to find common sequences, and lots of primers to get handles on the differential bits?

Yes, that sounds right. The method we were using (http://rice.genomics.purdue.edu/docs/ASPB_2003.pdf was the project I was working for) would wash dna fragments with specially prepared sequences named "overgos" which would stick to (hybridize?) DNA they matched. We'd get out these photographs that looked kinda like like microarrays (and I believe were generated with a similar process) but were black and white only, and we'd use that to tell which of the fragments the overgo matched. I am probably not qualified to give a really correct description of how it worked, I was just a code monkey. :)

Conclusion: Melons: The NIH will probably give you a grant to study them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Coin said:
I am probably not qualified to give a really correct description of how it worked, I was just a code monkey. :)

Conclusion: Melons: The NIH will probably give you a grant to study them.

Ah, important stuff. I'm a wetlab sort of dummy, and we appreciate having tools like that made for us.

Let's add this new paper from marcus's bibliography - it too talks about critical behaviour in GFTs.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.5687
Gravity as an emergent phenomenon: a GFT perspective
Lorenzo Sindoni
(Submitted on 28 May 2011)
While the idea of gravity as an emergent phenomenon is an intriguing one, little is known about concrete implementations that could lead to viable phenomenology, most of the obstructions being related to the intrinsic difficulties of formulating genuinely pregeometric theories. In this paper we present a preliminary discussion of the impact of critical behavior of certain microscopic models for gravity, based on group field theories, on the dynamics of the macroscopic regime. The continuum limit is examined in light of some scaling assumption, and the relevant consequences for low energy effective theories are discussed, the role of universality, the corrections to scaling, the emergence of gravitational theories and the nature of their thermodynamical behavior.
 
  • #10
Posted by Mtd2 in marcus's bibliography https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3331466&postcount=1493

MTd2 said:
ALMOST UNNOTICED, VERY IMPORTANT:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.6072v1

A generalization of the Virasoro algebra to arbitrary dimensions

Razvan Gurau
(Submitted on 30 May 2011)
Colored tensor models generalize matrix models in higher dimensions. They admit a 1/N expansion dominated by spherical topologies and exhibit a critical behavior strongly reminiscent of matrix models. In this paper we generalize the colored tensor models to colored models with generic interaction, derive the Schwinger Dyson equations in the large N limit and analyze the associated algebra of constraints satisfied at leading order by the partition function. We show that the constraints form a Lie algebra (indexed by trees) yielding a generalization of the Virasoro algebra in arbitrary dimensions.
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K