Is Scientific Notation Only for Approximating Large Numbers?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Scientific
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of scientific notation, particularly whether it is intended solely for approximating large numbers or if it can be used for expressing exact values. Participants explore the implications of using scientific notation for different numerical representations and its historical context in calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if scientific notation should be used for expressing exact numbers like 570,098, suggesting that it results in more digits than the original number.
  • Another participant notes that scientific notation was particularly useful in the era of slide rules, where only a limited number of digits could be handled, emphasizing its role in significant figures.
  • Concerns are raised about students reporting excessive significant figures from calculations, which may not reflect their measurement precision.
  • Some participants reflect on the transition from slide rules to modern calculators, discussing the implications for understanding significant digits and experimental error.
  • There is a side discussion about the value of vintage slide rules, with one participant sharing their experience of acquiring one and inquiring about its worth.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of scientific notation for exact values versus approximations. There is no consensus on whether scientific notation should be limited to approximations or if it can accurately represent precise numbers.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the limitations of calculators in conveying significant figures and the historical context of scientific notation's utility in manual calculations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students learning about scientific notation, educators exploring teaching methods, and individuals interested in the historical context of calculation tools in science and engineering.

Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
Obviously, if you wanted to express 500,000 in Scientific Notation, you would get:

5 x 10^5

My question is, what if you were asked to express 570,098?

Move the decimal 5 places to the left, and you'd get 5.70098. Apply Scientific Notation, and you get

5.70098 x 10^5

However, this expression actually contains MORE numbers than the original number, which is not the goal of Scientific Notation.

So is SN just for expressing approximations of large numbers? Should I have rounded 570,098 to 570,000?

Thanks a lot.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Scientific notation was most useful in the days of slide rules. At absolute max a slide rule can only carry 4 digits. To do a calculation with a slide rule you reduced all numbers to scientific notation with 3 or 4 digits then used the slide rule to perform the basic operations and in a separate calculation determined the order of magnitude by combining the powers of 10.

The curse and blessing of modern calculators is that this type of thinking is no longer necessary. You can just poke in the numbers hit the button and copy down every thing in the display. Of course the fact that most of the digits in the display of a calculator is useless noise does not bother most students for even a second.

A useful function of Scientific notation would be to make it clear how many significant digits you have.
 
Last edited:
Integral said:
Of course the fact that most of the digits in the display of a calculator is useless noise does not bother most students for even a second.
It always makes you wonder about a student's comprehension of 'experimental error' when they give answers to 8 or 9 significant places (or 12 for big calculators) which they derived from experimental values they measured to only 2 or 3 places at best. :cry:
 
Integral said:
Scientific notation was most useful in the days of slide rules. At absolute max a slide rule can only carry 4 digits. To do a calculation with a slide rule you reduced all numbers to scientific notation with 3 or 4 digits then used the slide rule to perform the basic operations and in a separate calculation determined the order of magnitude by combining the powers of 10.

The curse and blessing of modern calculators is that this type of thinking is no longer necessary. You can just poke in the numbers hit the button and copy down every thing in the display. Of course the fact that most of the digits in the display of a calculator is useless noise does not bother most students for even a second.

A useful function of Scientific notation would be to make it clear how many significant digits you have.

I never heard of slide rule's until the other day when my aunty got me one from 1962. I had no idea what it was...then I worked it out.
Are they worth anything?
 
Just curiosities now. A calculator can do anything a slide rule can, faster and more accurately. (I used to be able to find square roots on an abacus!)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K