Undergrad Simulating GR: Worth the Effort?

  • Thread starter Thread starter accdd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Simulating phenomena in general relativity (GR) is essential for understanding complex systems, particularly in light of recent advancements in gravitational wave observability from neutron-star mergers. The discussion emphasizes the importance of numerical methods in GR, especially for those studying relativistic hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics. Key resources include Luciano Rezzolla's tutorials and the book "Numerical Relativity: Starting from Scratch" by Baumgarte & Shapiro. The consensus is that computational skills are invaluable for progress in theoretical physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic programming skills in Python and Julia
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts from Carroll's book
  • Familiarity with relativistic hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics
  • Knowledge of high-energy nuclear physics and its relation to gravitational phenomena
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Luciano Rezzolla's numerical relativity tutorials
  • Read "Numerical Relativity: Starting from Scratch" by Baumgarte & Shapiro
  • Investigate the observability of gravitational waves from neutron-star mergers
  • Study the equation of state of nuclear matter in high-energy physics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students interested in computational methods in general relativity, particularly those focusing on gravitational wave phenomena and numerical simulations in theoretical physics.

accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
I know that simulation of phenomena in general relativity is computationally complex. However, simulating the phenomena you are studying often helps. In your opinion, should I study methods to simulate what happens in relativity? Is it worth it? Or would it distract me from the theoretical aspects?
I only know the basic programming in python and julia.
I am studying GR from Carroll's book.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say, if you are interested in numerical calculations in physics, it's a great time to do this in the field of general relativity right now. This field is "quite hot" at the moment due to the observability of gravitational wave signals from neutron-star mergers. It's also a fascinating, broad topic of (theoretical) physics, involving relativistic hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics as well as the equation of state of nuclear matter (high-energy nuclear physics) with close relations to heavy-ion physics as explored at the LHC, RHIC and in the near future close to my home at FAIR.

Here's the website of my astrophysical colleagues, working in this field:

https://relastro.uni-frankfurt.de/
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, PeroK and accdd
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes accdd and vanhees71
vanhees71 said:
Here's the website of my astrophysical colleagues, working in this field:

https://relastro.uni-frankfurt.de/

I love the ITP Calendar for Upcoming Events... :smile:

1654007562016.png
 
When results can’t easily be obtained by pure theoretical or mathematical methods, then (apart from actually building the system or finding the system and taking measurements of it) numerical methods are likely your only way to make progress.

Certainly, a detailed simulation (of any system) has a lot of complexity and may require many resources… but not every simulation has to be that detailed.

Here’s a new book by a colleague that may be helpful:
Numerical Relativity: Starting from Scratch
Baumgarte & Shapiro
https://www.cambridge.org/core/book...rom-scratch/FB5B832C4ED8EFE65A5834C6D6D4657D#

In my opinion, computation is a valuable skill not to be underestimated or undervalued, especially these days.
 
  • Like
Likes accdd and vanhees71
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K