Is sixfold degeneracy the maximum degeneracy an angular momentum can have?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the maximum degeneracy of energy states in quantum systems, particularly in three dimensions, and whether this maximum can be quantified as sixfold degeneracy. Participants explore the implications of different potentials and the conditions under which degeneracy occurs, referencing specific examples such as the hydrogen atom and the three-dimensional square well potential.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the maximum energy degeneracy can be six, suggesting that different states can yield the same energy through varying quantum numbers.
  • Another participant provides examples of combinations of squares that yield the same sum, indicating that there may be multiple ways to achieve the same energy level, but is uncertain if there is a bounded number of solutions.
  • A third participant discusses the relationship between bounded wave functions in three dimensions and the corresponding Schrödinger equations, proposing that there could be a maximum of six distinct quantization conditions.
  • A later reply seeks clarification on whether the original question pertains to the number of solutions for a given energy in three dimensions, noting that the degeneracy can depend on the potential involved.
  • Examples are provided, including the hydrogen atom's degeneracy based on quantum numbers and the energy scaling in a three-dimensional square well potential, which illustrates how degeneracy can vary with different systems.
  • Another example discusses the degeneracy in a D-dimensional harmonic oscillator, emphasizing that the degeneracy reflects the symmetry group of the potential.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the maximum degeneracy, with some proposing sixfold degeneracy while others suggest that the number of degenerate states may vary based on the potential and specific conditions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding whether a definitive maximum can be established.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the dependence on specific potentials and the mathematical representations involved, as well as the need for further exploration of the conditions under which degeneracy occurs.

thegreedyturt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If ψ is normalize-able and a function of nx, ny, nz, is the maximum energy degeneracy 6?

I.E. There can be degeneracy at the same Energy with each state taking a different value of n, yet adding up to some (nx^2+ny^2+nz^2)=Same E, due to the linearity of the operators involved. I guess the question is, assuming that any potential involved is physical and causes bounded states, can the maximum degenerate states be 3!.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your are looking for >6 ways to get the same sum of 3 squares?

3^2+4^2+n^2=25+n^2
5^2+0^2+n^2=25+n^2
+permutations

6^2+2^2+1^2=41
5^2+4^2+0^2=41
+permutations

7^2+1^2+n^2=50+n^2 for every n
5^2+5^2+n^2=50+n^2
+permutations (just up to 9 in per n, but without using 0^2)

I am sure there are more solutions. No idea if the number of different ways to get the same sum is bounded.
 
The question I'm struggling to get out is to say if you have a wave function that is bounded on three dimensions with a specific energy, will you at maximum have 3 different separated Schrödinger's Eq, and of those maximum versions have 3 quantization conditions for each dimension. Which implies that there are a maximum of 6 ways for the 3 quantization conditions to exist when all are different values (and the sum is of course the total E).

Or am I missing an idea with the bounds and possible potentials?
 
I am not sure if I understand the question correctly.

You are looking for solutions

[tex](H-E)\,\psi_{E,\nu}(\vec{r}) = 0;\;\nu=1 \ldots N(E)[/tex]

in D=3 dimensions. Each energy E has N-fold degeneracy where N(E) could in general depend on E.

Is this correct?

Example 1: for the hydrogen atom you have for each E i.e. each n:

[tex]l=0,1, \ldots n-1[/tex]
[tex]m=-l, \ldots +l[/tex]

which means that each n has n²-fold degeneracy

[tex]n=1:\;N=1[/tex]
[tex]n=2:\;N=1+3=4[/tex]
[tex]n=3:\;N=1+3+5=9[/tex]
...
[tex]n:\;N=n^2[/tex]

Example 2: for the 3-dim. square well potential the energy scales as

[tex]E = n_x^2 + n_y^2 + n_z^2[/tex]

So for each E you have N-fold degenaracy where N counts the number of ways you can write the same E as sum of three squares

[tex]E = 3 = 1+1+1[/tex]
[tex]E = 6 = 1+1+4 = 1+4+1 = 4+1+1[/tex]
[tex]E = 9 = 1+4+4 = 4+1+4 = 4+4+1[/tex]

Example 3: for the D-dim. harmonic oscillator the energy scales as

[tex]E = n_1 + n_2 + \ldots + n_D[/tex]

For D=3 you have

[tex]E = 0 = 0+0+0[/tex]
[tex]E = 1 = 0+0+1 = 0+1+0 = 1+0+0[/tex]
[tex]E = 2 = 0+0+2 = 0+1+1 = 0+2+0 = 1+0+1 = 1+1+0 = 2+0+0[/tex]

So the degeneracy for given E depends on the potential.

Usually the degeneracy N(E) reflects the dimension of a representation of a symmetry group of the potential. For rotationally invariant potentials these are the representations of SO(3), for the hydrogen atom this is SO(4), for the D-dim. Harmonic oscillator this is SU(D) which is larger than SO(D).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K