Is space infinitely divisible?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ktoz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the divisibility of space and its implications in the context of relativity and quantum physics. The concept of spacetime being infinitely divisible is challenged by the existence of fundamental limits such as the Planck length and Planck time. An experiment involving a photon source and detector is proposed to investigate potential time differences in light travel across a finely divided geodesic sphere. The conversation highlights the technological limitations in conducting such experiments due to the vast scale difference between the Planck scale and observable phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativity and its effects on spacetime
  • Familiarity with quantum physics concepts, specifically Planck length and Planck time
  • Knowledge of photon behavior and light propagation
  • Basic principles of experimental design in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Planck length and Planck time on spacetime structure
  • Explore the concept of space-time foam and its relevance to quantum gravity
  • Investigate experimental techniques for measuring light travel time at quantum scales
  • Learn about geodesic spheres and their applications in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the fundamental nature of spacetime and its divisibility.

ktoz
Messages
170
Reaction score
12
I've been pondering the measurement of distance and how it is affected by relativity and was wondering if there is some general consensus on whether spacetime is infinitely divisible?

I spent a few hours Googling but didn't come across any definitive statements either way.

I came up with the following experiment which could conceivably answer the question but find my limited knowledge isn't getting me any closer.

If you have a photon source and a photon detector and systematically fire individual photons at the detector from all points on a geodesic sphere with extremely fine tesselation (on the order of an atom between points) could there conceivably be some radius where light took longer to travel along a given vector than other vectors?

If there is a limit to how finely space can be divided then at some point, there should be a time difference because light would have to hop from node to node of the underlying structure of space and some vectors would have more nodes to hop.

If space is infinitely divisible then no matter how far the photon source is from the detector, the time would always be the same for a given radius.

Anyone care to hazard a guess?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a very wriggly can of worms. Extrapolating from quantum physics, it is believed there is a smallest length, time and energy. But at these scales space-time is not as we know it. Experiments are out of the question with our current technology because of the factor of about 10^30 btween the Planck scale and the nuclear scale.

Do a Google on 'Planck length', 'Planck time' and 'space-time foam'.

M
 
Last edited:
Mentz114 said:
Experiments are out of the question with our current technology because of the factor of about 10^30 btween the Planck scale and the nuclear scale.

Just to get some perspective on the 10^30 scale difference, I did a calculation and unless I messed up, that's like comparing a volume 1/50 the radius of this period ->.<- with the Earth. Yikes! That is small.

Thanks for the search terms Mentz114

Ken
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K