# Is space infinitely divisible?

## Main Question or Discussion Point

I've been pondering the measurement of distance and how it is affected by relativity and was wondering if there is some general consensus on whether spacetime is infinitely divisible?

I spent a few hours Googling but didn't come across any definitive statements either way.

I came up with the following experiment which could conceivably answer the question but find my limited knowlege isn't getting me any closer.

If you have a photon source and a photon detector and systematically fire individual photons at the detector from all points on a geodesic sphere with extremely fine tesselation (on the order of an atom between points) could there conceivably be some radius where light took longer to travel along a given vector than other vectors?

If there is a limit to how finely space can be divided then at some point, there should be a time difference because light would have to hop from node to node of the underlying structure of space and some vectors would have more nodes to hop.

If space is infinitely divisible then no matter how far the photon source is from the detector, the time would always be the same for a given radius.

Anyone care to hazard a guess?

Last edited:

## Answers and Replies

Related Special and General Relativity News on Phys.org
This is a very wriggly can of worms. Extrapolating from quantum physics, it is believed there is a smallest length, time and energy. But at these scales space-time is not as we know it. Experiments are out of the question with our current technology because of the factor of about 10^30 btween the Planck scale and the nuclear scale.

Do a Google on 'Planck length', 'Planck time' and 'space-time foam'.

M

Last edited:
Experiments are out of the question with our current technology because of the factor of about 10^30 btween the Planck scale and the nuclear scale.
Just to get some perspective on the 10^30 scale difference, I did a calculation and unless I messed up, that's like comparing a volume 1/50 the radius of this period ->.<- with the Earth. Yikes! That is small.

Thanks for the search terms Mentz114

Ken