Is Sqrt(-1) not unique? I.e. is i not the only one?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Curl
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the uniqueness of the square root of -1 in the context of complex numbers, specifically examining whether the imaginary unit \( i \) is the only solution to the equation \( x^2 = -1 \). Participants explore the implications of this question through mathematical reasoning and definitions related to complex numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the calculation of \( 1/i \) and its implications, suggesting that \( (1/i)^2 = -1 \) aligns with the definition of \( i \).
  • Another participant clarifies that \( 1/i = -i \) by manipulating the expression, indicating that both \( i \) and \( -i \) satisfy the equation \( x^2 = -1 \).
  • A different participant warns about the care needed with square roots, noting that equations can have multiple solutions, as exemplified by \( x^2 = 25 \) having both \( +5 \) and \( -5 \) as solutions.
  • Further elaboration is provided on the nature of complex numbers, emphasizing that every number has two roots, and discussing the formal definition of complex numbers as pairs of real numbers.
  • One participant states that both \( (0, 1) \) and \( (0, -1) \) yield the same product of -1, reinforcing the idea that -1 has two complex roots.
  • A final note mentions that every number, real or complex, has two roots, with the exception of zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that both \( i \) and \( -i \) are solutions to the equation \( x^2 = -1 \), but there is no consensus on the implications of this for the uniqueness of \( i \) as a square root of -1. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of these roots and their definitions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of understanding and rigor in their definitions and calculations, leading to potential ambiguities in the discussion. The exploration of complex numbers and their properties is not fully resolved, with some assumptions about definitions and uniqueness left unaddressed.

Curl
Messages
756
Reaction score
0
Sorry for the dumb question, I'm not good at mathematics, but:

what is 1/i ?

1/i * 1/i = 1*1 / (i*i) = 1/-1 = -1 ?

If so the number, 1/i has the property that (1/i)^2 = -1 which is the definition of i.

BUT, 1/i is not equal to i because if it did:

1/i * i would be i*i= -1

however,

1/i * i = i / i = 1 ?

So can someone explain what's going on? Where did I make the mistake(s)?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\frac{1}{i}=-i##, because by multiplying the numerator and denominator with ##i## we get ##\frac{1}{i}=\frac{i}{i^{2}}=\frac{i}{-1}=-i##. The numbers ##i## and ##-i## both solve the equation ##x^{2}=-1##. The square root or higher roots can't be defined uniquely in complex algebra.
 
Curl said:
If so the number, 1/i has the property that (1/i)^2 = -1 which is the definition of i.

This is where your problem lies. You have to be careful with square roots. x^2 = 25, but does that mean x is +5 or -5? I think you can figure it out from that.
 
Every number, real or complex, has two roots. -1 has the two roots i and -i. Your (1/i) is equal to -i.

And, while "i^2= -1" is often used as a defining property of "i", it cannot really be used as a "definition" because, as you say, -i has that same property.

If you want a rigorously correct definition of complex numbers, you have to do something like this:
"The complex numbers consist of pairs of real numbers, (a, b), with addition defined by (a, b)+ (c, d)= (a+ c, b+ d) and multiplication by (a, b)(c, d)= (ac- bc, ad+ bc). Notice that (a, 0)+ (c, 0)= (a+ c, 0) and (a, 0)(c, 0)= (ac, 0) so we can think of the real numbers as being those complex numbers of the form (a, 0). Further, (0, 1)(0, 1)= (0(0)- 1(1), 0(1)+ 1(0))= (-1, 0) so that the product of (0, 1) with itself is the complex number representing the real number -1. If we now define "i" to be (0, 1), we have "i^2= -1" We can also say that (a, b)= (a, 0)+ (0, b)= a(1, 0)+ b(0, 1). We are thinking of the complex number (1,0) as representing the real number 1 and since we have defined "i" to be (0, 1), we have (a, b) represented by a+ bi.

Now both (0, 1) and (0, -1) have the property that (0, 1)(0, 1)= (0(0)- 1(1), 0(1)+ 1(0))= (-1, 0) and (0, -1)(0,-1)= (0(0)- (-1)(-1), 0(-1)+ (-1)(0))= (-1, 0). That is "-1" has two complex roots but now we can distinguish between i= (0, 1) and -i= (0, -1).
 
HallsofIvy said:
Every number, real or complex, has two roots.
Exception: zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K