Is Superposition the Explanation for Bell Inequality Violations ?

  • Thread starter morrobay
  • Start date
  • #1
morrobay
Gold Member
767
221
This form of a Bell inequality: n[x-y+] + n[y-z-] ≥ n[x+z+] is derived from spin measurements
at A and B when detector settings are aligned. If it is correct that when a particle is measured
at detector A and is spin up in the y direction , then its entangled twin at B is in superposition, spin up-spin down in the x and z direction. Then , if so, is the realism assumption in the above inequality invalidated when detectors are not aligned ?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
meBigGuy
Gold Member
2,323
405
Probability calculations for entangled quantum systems (two electrons in the singlet state for example) violate Bell's inequality. The calculations neccessarily include observations with unaligned detectors since three groups are needed. Superposition is fundamental to unobserved quantum systems. There is no "explanation" for Bell Inequality Violations other than that's what the Math says, and experiments bear it out. (I'm still learning this stuff. We'll see how much trouble I just got in)
 

Related Threads on Is Superposition the Explanation for Bell Inequality Violations ?

  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
4
Replies
97
Views
14K
Replies
58
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
354
Replies
70
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
3K
Top