Is Synchronized Vehicle Acceleration the Solution to Traffic Delays?

  • Thread starter Thread starter G01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of synchronized vehicle acceleration as a potential solution to traffic delays. Participants explore various aspects of this idea, including technological implementations, safety concerns, and the implications of automation in driving.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that synchronized vehicle acceleration could improve commute efficiency and safety, allowing drivers to engage in other activities while driving.
  • Concerns are raised about the trustworthiness of automated driving systems, with some participants expressing skepticism about fully relying on such technology.
  • One participant proposes the idea of encoding road layouts with infrared paint strips to enhance vehicle navigation and communication, while others discuss the feasibility and power requirements of such systems.
  • Vehicle-to-vehicle communication is mentioned as a current technology that could facilitate synchronized acceleration, although its effectiveness in practice is questioned.
  • Some participants reflect on the human tendency to become complacent with automation, raising concerns about potential dangers if drivers do not remain attentive.
  • There is a discussion about the reaction times of drivers at traffic signals and how synchronized acceleration could mitigate delays caused by individual response times.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of enthusiasm and skepticism regarding synchronized vehicle acceleration and automated driving systems. There is no clear consensus on the feasibility or safety of these technologies, and multiple competing views remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding driver behavior, technology reliability, and the practical implementation of proposed systems, which remain unresolved.

G01
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,704
Reaction score
19
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
 
Phlogistonian said:
I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.

Sounds like your Hardware Abstraction Layer is messed up. I'd suggest you fix it before you reach your destination.
 
50 years from now, that car in the picture will seem to us now just like a 10mb harddrive from the 80s.
 
That would make the commute much more efficient. You could talk on your cell phone, change your CD's, fix your make-up, drink your coffee, all while driving 20 feet behind the person in front of you on the interstate at 75 mph.

Wait, people already do that.

Well, it would make driving safer. What would MADD do?
 
The only problem I have with systems like this, is that I don't think I would ever trust it 100%. In other words, even though it would take over driving for me, I would still have to keep my hands close to the steering wheel and continue to maintain full attention in anticipation of having to make a correction... or an emergency maneuver.

What I'm relating this to is the autopilot and autolanding systems in aircraft. Each pilot that I've spoken with has said that they do not 100% trust the autopilot feature and still maintain full attention when it is engaged. There is apparently even less less confidence with the autolanding feature.
 
How about encoding the road layout in wide infrared paint strips on the road. You car reads the information from the encoded road and knows about the 30 degree curve and stop sign ahead. Add a radar system, and a full mesh car computer to car computer communication and your are done.
 
sirzerp said:
How about encoding the road layout in wide infrared paint strips on the road. You car reads the information from the encoded road and knows about the 30 degree curve and stop sign ahead. Add a radar system, and a full mesh car computer to car computer communication and your are done.

Not a bad idea. I wouldn't be surprised if a type of transponder unit was installed at say, 1/2 mile or 1 mile increments along stretches of freeways or highways. The units would then be able communicate with the cars onboard system and could relay information about upcoming traffic jams, accidents, weather conditions or construction. Off the top of my head, the only downside I can see would be the required power for each and every unit along a given stretch... which 'could' eventually add up to a substantial amount. I'm not sure how much power would be needed for a unit like that though.

A passive in-road setup with reactive strips, like you suggested, would be more reliable though.
 
  • #10
B. Elliott said:
The only problem I have with systems like this, is that I don't think I would ever trust it 100%. In other words, even though it would take over driving for me, I would still have to keep my hands close to the steering wheel and continue to maintain full attention in anticipation of having to make a correction... or an emergency maneuver.

Initially, I think that would happen. The problem is, I think over time, people would become more and more comfortable with it and complacent and not pay much attention. Considering there are already nitwits driving off the road while following their GPS/navigation device thingy without paying attention to whether the road it has programmed in is really present, I don't think it would take long before cars on autopilot were driving into lakes when someone programmed a right instead of a left into the directions and the driver wasn't paying any attention.
 
  • #11
Vehicle to vehicle communications always comes to mind when I am fifteen cars back sitting at a red light.

When the light turns green the first car starts off almost immediately, but as the time to step on the gas trickles back through the line of cars the reaction time slows down. By the time I finally step on the gas the light is red again.

I've always thought how great it would be if all of the cars accelerated in sync. All of the dumb bunnies sitting there not paying attention would be moving instantly.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
955
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K