Is tan: (-π/2, π/2) -> R a Homeomorphism?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function tan: (-π/2, π/2) -> R is established as a homeomorphism, demonstrating both continuity and bijectiveness. The proof involves showing that both the function and its inverse, arctan, are continuous. The discussion highlights that the continuity of tan can be easily proven using power series for sine and cosine. Additionally, it is noted that tan is not only a homeomorphism but also a diffeomorphism, simplifying the proof in one-dimensional space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of homeomorphisms and diffeomorphisms in topology
  • Familiarity with the properties of trigonometric functions, specifically sine and cosine
  • Knowledge of continuity and open sets in real analysis
  • Ability to work with power series expansions of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of homeomorphisms and diffeomorphisms in more depth
  • Learn about the power series expansions of sine and cosine functions
  • Explore the concept of continuity in the context of real-valued functions
  • Investigate the implications of the inverse function theorem in one dimension
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology and real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of trigonometric functions and their applications in higher mathematics.

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
Show that tan: (-pie/2,pie/2)->R is a homeomorphism where tan = sin/cos

To show that f and f^-1 are cts, it seems trivial from a sketch but how do you do it?

For 1-1 tan(x) = tan(y)

Need to knwo x =y

tan(x) = sinx.cosx = siny/cosy = tany

=> sixcosy = sinycosx

this gets you sin(x-y) = 0
But x-y = pie

What's wrong here?

Onto is obvious
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are infinitely many solutions to the equation sin t = 0... but not many that are consistent with the conditions of your problem.

(Incidentally, it's not just a homeomorphism, but also a diffeomorphism. That's easier to prove, since we're in dimension 1. :wink:)
 
Then it must be 0 because the domain is the interval (-pie/2,pie/2)

So how do I show that f and f^-1 are cts?
 
How have you defined them? e.g. showing tan to be continuous is trivial if you've defined sine and cosine via power series (or are allowed to use their power series)
 
So for onto
for all y in R there exists an x in (-pie/2,pie/2) s.t. f(x)=y

WTS: tanx = y

Let y = siny/cosy = tany

let x = y => y = tany = tanx

is that sufficient? y could be inf.
 
How can y be 'inf'? Neither is infinity in R, nor is pi/2 (pi does not have an e) in the interval (-pi/2,pi/2).
 
So then how would you show f^-1 is cts ?
 
Okay let me try again.

To show that f is cts pick an open subset G in R. then f-1 = arc tanx: R -> -pie/2, pie/2)

Suppose G is the interval (a,b).

Let f-1(G) = A. Thus A is contained in (-pie/2,pie/2)

f-1(G) is an element of (f-1(a),f-1(b))=A

which is an open subset and therefore cts.

To show that the inverse of f is cts.

we want to show that for any open G in (-pie/2,pie/2) thus f-1(G) = A where A is open.

IF G = (a,b) then f-1(G) is an element of (f-1(a),f-1(b)) = (tana,tanb) which is an open interval.

and hence cts.

Is this correct?
 
Okay, is there anything wrong with it?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K