Is the Adjoint of a Commutator Negative of the Commutator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stumpoman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The adjoint of a commutator, represented as \(\left [ A,B \right ]^{\dagger}\), is definitively equal to the negative of the commutator itself, expressed as \(-\left [A,B \right ]\). This conclusion is derived from the properties of adjoint operators and the definition of the commutator \(\left [ A,B \right ] = AB - BA\). The discussion emphasizes that this relationship holds true regardless of whether the operators are Hermitian, as demonstrated through counterexamples using non-Hermitian 2x2 matrices in R.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of commutators in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with adjoint operators and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of matrix operations, including multiplication and transposition
  • Proficiency in R programming for matrix manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of non-Hermitian matrices in linear algebra
  • Investigate the use of R for advanced matrix computations
  • Study the applications of commutators in quantum mechanics and their significance
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and mathematics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, linear algebra, and computational methods using R.

stumpoman
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that
\left [ A,B \right ]^{\dagger}=-\left [A,B \right ]

Homework Equations


\left [ A,B \right ] = AB-BA\left (AB \right)^{\dagger}= B^{\dagger}A^{\dagger}

The Attempt at a Solution


\left [ A,B \right ]^{\dagger}=\left (AB-BA \right )^{\dagger}=\left (AB \right )^{\dagger}-\left (BA \right )^{\dagger}=B^{\dagger}A^{\dagger}-A^{\dagger}B^{\dagger}=-\left (A^{\dagger}B^{\dagger}-B^{\dagger}A^{\dagger} \right )=-\left [ A^{\dagger},B^{\dagger} \right ]
I can only see this working if the operators are Hermitian but the question did not specify it as such.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
Physics news on Phys.org
A quick way to solve the problem of being given a potentially incorrectly specified question is to look for a counterexample. Keep it as simple as possible. In this case, you can choose two 2 x 2 real matrices that are non-symmetric - hence non-Hermitian. Then do the calc and see if the result holds.

I used the following R code to test this (the 't' function performs a transpose and %*% does matrix mult)

A=array(c(1,0,1,2),dim=c(2,2))
A=array(c(2,1,0,1),dim=c(2,2))
t(A%*%B-B%*%A)
-(A%*%B-B%*%A)
t(A%*%B-B%*%A)-(-(A%*%B-B%*%A))
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K