MHB Is the Analysis of Principal Ideals Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Fraleigh (A First Course in Abstract Algebra) defines principal ideals in section 27 on page 250. His definition is as follows:

===============================================================================================

"27.21 Definition

If R is a commutative ring with unity and a \in R , the ideal \{ ra | r \in R \} of all multiples of a is the principal ideal generated by a and is denoted <a>.

An ideal N of R is a principal ideal if N = <a> for some a \in R

=================================================================================================

Consider N =\{ ra | r \in R \} ......(1)

If we take r = a in (1) then we have ra = aa = a^2 \in N

If we take r = a and a^2 \in N the we have using (1) again that ra = a^2 a = a^3 \in N

Continuing this, then we have a, a^2, a^3, a^4, a^5 , ... all belonging to N along with the other elements where r \ne a

Is the above analysis correct regarding the nature of principal ideals?

Would really appreciate this issue being clarified.

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
Fraleigh (A First Course in Abstract Algebra) defines principal ideals in section 27 on page 250. His definition is as follows:

===============================================================================================

"27.21 Definition

If R is a commutative ring with unity and a \in R , the ideal \{ ra | r \in R \} of all multiples of a is the principal ideal generated by a and is denoted <a>.

An ideal N of R is a principal ideal if N = <a> for some a \in R

=================================================================================================

Consider N =\{ ra | r \in R \} ......(1)

If we take r = a in (1) then we have ra = aa = a^2 \in N

If we take r = a and a^2 \in N the we have using (1) again that ra = a^2 a = a^3 \in N

Continuing this, then we have a, a^2, a^3, a^4, a^5 , ... all belonging to N along with the other elements where r \ne a

Is the above analysis correct regarding the nature of principal ideals?

Would really appreciate this issue being clarified.

Peter

Hi Peter!

Yes, that is correct.

You might also say that $r=a^n \in R$ for $n \in \mathbb N$, so $a^n \cdot a = a^{n+1} \in N$.
And since you also have unity in R, it follows that $1a \in N$, and therefore $a^n \in N$.
 
Thanks so much for that clarification - can now proceed on with some confidence :D
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top