MHB Is the Analysis of Principal Ideals Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Fraleigh (A First Course in Abstract Algebra) defines principal ideals in section 27 on page 250. His definition is as follows:

===============================================================================================

"27.21 Definition

If R is a commutative ring with unity and a \in R , the ideal \{ ra | r \in R \} of all multiples of a is the principal ideal generated by a and is denoted <a>.

An ideal N of R is a principal ideal if N = <a> for some a \in R

=================================================================================================

Consider N =\{ ra | r \in R \} ......(1)

If we take r = a in (1) then we have ra = aa = a^2 \in N

If we take r = a and a^2 \in N the we have using (1) again that ra = a^2 a = a^3 \in N

Continuing this, then we have a, a^2, a^3, a^4, a^5 , ... all belonging to N along with the other elements where r \ne a

Is the above analysis correct regarding the nature of principal ideals?

Would really appreciate this issue being clarified.

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
Fraleigh (A First Course in Abstract Algebra) defines principal ideals in section 27 on page 250. His definition is as follows:

===============================================================================================

"27.21 Definition

If R is a commutative ring with unity and a \in R , the ideal \{ ra | r \in R \} of all multiples of a is the principal ideal generated by a and is denoted <a>.

An ideal N of R is a principal ideal if N = <a> for some a \in R

=================================================================================================

Consider N =\{ ra | r \in R \} ......(1)

If we take r = a in (1) then we have ra = aa = a^2 \in N

If we take r = a and a^2 \in N the we have using (1) again that ra = a^2 a = a^3 \in N

Continuing this, then we have a, a^2, a^3, a^4, a^5 , ... all belonging to N along with the other elements where r \ne a

Is the above analysis correct regarding the nature of principal ideals?

Would really appreciate this issue being clarified.

Peter

Hi Peter!

Yes, that is correct.

You might also say that $r=a^n \in R$ for $n \in \mathbb N$, so $a^n \cdot a = a^{n+1} \in N$.
And since you also have unity in R, it follows that $1a \in N$, and therefore $a^n \in N$.
 
Thanks so much for that clarification - can now proceed on with some confidence :D
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top