Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,920
- 48
Fraleigh (A First Course in Abstract Algebra) defines principal ideals in section 27 on page 250. His definition is as follows:
===============================================================================================
"27.21 Definition
If R is a commutative ring with unity and a \in R , the ideal \{ ra | r \in R \} of all multiples of a is the principal ideal generated by a and is denoted <a>.
An ideal N of R is a principal ideal if N = <a> for some a \in R
=================================================================================================
Consider N =\{ ra | r \in R \} ......(1)
If we take r = a in (1) then we have ra = aa = a^2 \in N
If we take r = a and a^2 \in N the we have using (1) again that ra = a^2 a = a^3 \in N
Continuing this, then we have a, a^2, a^3, a^4, a^5 , ... all belonging to N along with the other elements where r \ne a
Is the above analysis correct regarding the nature of principal ideals?
Would really appreciate this issue being clarified.
Peter
===============================================================================================
"27.21 Definition
If R is a commutative ring with unity and a \in R , the ideal \{ ra | r \in R \} of all multiples of a is the principal ideal generated by a and is denoted <a>.
An ideal N of R is a principal ideal if N = <a> for some a \in R
=================================================================================================
Consider N =\{ ra | r \in R \} ......(1)
If we take r = a in (1) then we have ra = aa = a^2 \in N
If we take r = a and a^2 \in N the we have using (1) again that ra = a^2 a = a^3 \in N
Continuing this, then we have a, a^2, a^3, a^4, a^5 , ... all belonging to N along with the other elements where r \ne a
Is the above analysis correct regarding the nature of principal ideals?
Would really appreciate this issue being clarified.
Peter