Is the API Hydrocarbon Emission Formula Dimensionally Consistent?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
popoff
Messages
2
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The American Petroleum Institute has published a correlation for determining the hydrocarbon emissions from fixed-roof storage tanks

Ly = (24/1000) * (p/(14.7-p))^0.68 * D^1.73 * H^0.51 * T^0.5 * Fp * C

where: Ly is breathing emissions, bbl/yr; p is the true vapor pressure at the bulk temperature, psia; D is the tank diameter, ft; H is the height in ft; T is the average tank outage corrected for roof volume, ft; Fp is the dimensionless paint factor; and C is the dimensionless adjustment factor.

Is this equation dimensionally consistent?

Homework Equations


Unit conversions

The Attempt at a Solution


I have a doubt with the (p/(14.7-p))^0.68 term. I think it should be dimensionless, but I am not totally sure as there is a 14.7 with no units minus a pressure in psia...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ayeshanaved23
Physics news on Phys.org
popoff said:
I have a doubt with the (p/(14.7-p))^0.68 term. I think it should be dimensionless, but I am not totally sure as there is a 14.7 with no units minus a pressure in psia...
It's terms like that that indicate that this is not an equation, but a formula. There are many such formulas for different disciplines, typically compiled into handbooks, where you must enter the variable values as dimensionless magnitudes of quantities that are given in specific units. A formula is "true" only so long as you specify all quantities in the required units and don't entry the units :smile:

A formula's constants typically have no units so you can't trivially "translate" the formula to work with other units, and since you have to interpret the result of the formula in particular units you can't just treat the expression as an equation and "solve" for any of the variables in terms of the others without putting some thought into what you're doing.