Is the book wrong again for this e field problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pyroknife
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the total charge of a nonconducting spherical shell with inner radius R1 and outer radius R2, given a uniform volume charge density ρ. The correct formula for total charge is Q = ρV = ρ(4/3)π(R2^3 - R1^3). The confusion arises from a reference to a book that suggests Q = ρ(4/3)π(r^3 - R1^3), which pertains to the charge within a radius r, applicable for electric field calculations using Gauss' law. The participants confirm that the book's interpretation is not aligned with the total charge calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and charge distribution
  • Familiarity with Gauss' law and its applications
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and volume calculations
  • Basic proficiency in calculus for volume integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Gauss' law and its implications for electric fields
  • Explore the concept of charge density and its role in electrostatics
  • Learn about the properties of spherical shells in electrostatic contexts
  • Review examples of charge calculations in different geometries
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone studying electrostatics, particularly those focusing on charge distribution and electric fields in spherical geometries.

pyroknife
Messages
611
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



A nonconducting SPHERICAL SHELL of inner radius R1 and outer radius R2 has a uniform volume charge density p. Find the total charge on the shell

Homework Equations


Q=pV=p(4/3)*pi*(R2^3-R1^3) << That's what I got
the book had Q=pV=p(4/3)*pi*(r^3-R1^3) <<how can that be correct if you're finding the total charge the shell, not from R1 to r?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer is right, but are you sure that you are quoting the book correctly? The book could be referring to the charge contained within a radius r, such that R1<r<R2 (which can be applied to find the electric field by Gauss' law)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
973
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
13K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K