MHB Is the Condition Number of A'A Related to its Matrix Norm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the condition number of a matrix \( A \) and its transpose \( A^T \). It is established that the condition number \( k_2(A^TA) \) can be expressed as \( (k_2(A))^2 \). The participants explore the definitions of matrix norms and the implications of maximizing certain quadratic forms involving \( A \) and \( A^TA \). The conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding how these norms and condition numbers relate to each other, particularly in the context of unit vectors. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the mathematical connections between the condition numbers and the properties of the matrices involved.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We have a matrix $A\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$ which has the rank $n$. The condition number is defined as $\displaystyle{k(A)=\frac{\max_{\|x\|=1}\|Ax\|}{\min_{\|x\|=1}\|Ax\|}}$.

I want to show that $k_2(A^TA)=\left (k_2(A)\right )^2$. We have that $$k_2(A^TA)=\frac{\max_{\|x\|_2=1}\|(A^TA)x\|_2}{\min_{\|x\|_2=1}\|(A^TA)x\|_2}$$

It holds that $$\|(A^TA)x\|_2=\left ((A^TA)x, (A^TA)x\right )=\left (A^TAx\right )^T\left (A^TAx\right )=x^TA^TAA^TAx=\left (Ax\right )^T\left (AA^T\right )\left (Ax\right )$$
We also have that $$\|Ax\|_2=\left (Ax, Ax\right )=\left (Ax\right )^T\left (Ax\right )=x^TA^TAx=x^T\left (A^TA\right )x$$

How do we continue? (Wondering)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey mathmari!

Shouldn't it be $\|Ax\|_2 = \sqrt{(Ax,Ax)}$ or $\|Ax\|_2^2 = (Ax,Ax)$? (Worried)

So we have:
$$\|Ax\|_2^2=x^T\left (A^TA\right )x$$

We also have:
$$\|(A^TA)x\|_2^2=x^TA^TAA^TAx=x^T(A^TA)^2x$$

Suppose $x$ is a vector of unit length for which $x^T\left (A^TA\right )x$ takes on its maximal value.
Then $x^T(A^TA)^2x$ will also take its maximal value, won't it? (Wondering)
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Shouldn't it be $\|Ax\|_2 = \sqrt{(Ax,Ax)}$ or $\|Ax\|_2^2 = (Ax,Ax)$? (Worried)

Ohh yes! (Blush)
Klaas van Aarsen said:
So we have:
$$\|Ax\|_2^2=x^T\left (A^TA\right )x$$

We also have:
$$\|(A^TA)x\|_2^2=x^TA^TAA^TAx=x^T(A^TA)^2x$$

Suppose $x$ is a vector of unit length for which $x^T\left (A^TA\right )x$ takes on its maximal value.
Then $x^T(A^TA)^2x$ will also take its maximal value, won't it? (Wondering)

Will $x^T(A^TA)^2x$ take also its maximal value because the term in the middle is the square of the previous one? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Will $x^T(A^TA)^2x$ take also its maximal value because the term in the middle is the square of the previous one?

Well, to be fair, this is not immediately obvious. (Worried)

Let's take a slightly different angle.

According to the wiki page about matrix norms, a matrix $A$ has norm $\|A\|_2 =\sup\limits_{\|x\|=1} \|Ax\|_2 = \sqrt{\lambda_{\text{max}}(A^*A)}=\sigma_{\text{max}}(A)$, where $A^*$ is the conjugate transpose, which is just the transpose $A^T$ for a real matrix.

So $\|A^TA\|_2 = \sqrt{\lambda_{\text{max}}((A^TA)^T A^TA)}$, isn't it? (Wondering)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top