Is the Cubic Formula More Complex Than the Quadratic Formula?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Char. Limit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complexity of the cubic formula compared to the quadratic formula. The cubic equation is expressed as ax3 + bx2 + cx + d, and can be simplified using the substitution x = y - (a/3), leading to the reduced form y3 + py + q. The parameters p and q are defined as p = b - (a2/3) and q = c - (ab/3) + (2a3/27). The cubic formula involves intricate calculations, including cubic roots and discriminants, making it significantly more complex than the quadratic formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial equations, specifically cubic equations.
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation and substitution methods.
  • Knowledge of cubic roots and their properties.
  • Basic grasp of discriminants in polynomial equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the cubic formula in detail.
  • Learn about the discriminant of cubic equations and its implications for the nature of roots.
  • Explore numerical methods for solving cubic equations, such as Newton's method.
  • Investigate the historical context and significance of the cubic formula in mathematics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching algebra, and anyone interested in the complexities of polynomial equations, particularly those comparing quadratic and cubic formulas.

Char. Limit
Gold Member
Messages
1,222
Reaction score
23
The proof of the quadratic formula was so simple, I moved to the proof of the cubic formula with supreme confidence. And found myself awash in as and cs and cubic roots.

Can you turn this equation into a cubic?

[tex]x=-\frac{b}{3a}[/tex]

[tex]-\frac{1}{3a}\sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2}(2b^3-9abc+27(a^2)d+\sqrt{(2b^3-9abc+27(a^2)d)^2-4(b^2-3ac)^3}}[/tex]

[tex]-\frac{1}{3a}\sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2}(2b^3-9abc+27(a^2)d-\sqrt{(2b^3-9abc+27(a^2)d)^2-4(b^2-3ac)^3}}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Googling "proof of cubic formula" gives this proof.
 
First, the cubic equation: [tex]ax^3+bx^2+cx+d[/tex]. With [tex]x=y-\frac{a}{3}[/tex], you can reduce the equation to [tex]y^3+py+q[/tex]. [tex]p=b-\frac{a^2}{3}[/tex] and [tex]q=c-\frac{ab}{3}+\frac{2a^3}{27}[/tex]. In a cubic equation there are 3 possible answers, the one you listed would be one of the 3, [tex]X_{1}[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K