Is the current view of the intergalactic speed limit short sighted?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the misconception regarding Einstein's theory of relativity, specifically the intergalactic speed limit defined by the speed of light. A participant incorrectly asserts that mass only converts to energy at the speed of light squared, which is refuted by another contributor who clarifies that mass remains invariant under Lorentz transformation. The contributor emphasizes that the equation E=mc² represents rest energy and does not dictate the speed limit of the universe. Understanding the full implications of special relativity requires a deeper exploration of Lorentz transformations and related equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with the equation E=mc²
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformations
  • Basic concepts of energy and momentum conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Explore the implications of Minkowski space
  • Research the concept of invariant mass in special relativity
  • Learn about pair production and its relation to mass-energy conversion
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in advanced concepts of relativity and the fundamental limits of speed in the universe.

Bob c2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is the current view of the intergalactic "speed limit" short sighted?

Just a question that may have some enlightening answers...
Einstein says that the interstellar speed limit is the speed of light. What happened to E=MC2?
If mass doesn't convert to energy till accelerated to the square of the speed of light, would it not follow that the increase in mass occurs as it approaches the square of the speed of light, rather than the speed of light? If this were true, then faster than light drives should be able to go many times the speed of light up to approaching the square of the speed of light.
Just a question that may have some enlightening answers...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think you're misunderstanding Einstein's energy equation. Who told you mass doesn't convert to energy unless it reaches the speed of light squared? That equation is a statement of the amount of internal energy an object has at a given mass. When combined with other relativistic equations, such as energy and momentum conservation, this equation allows mass to be converted to energy and vice versa. One example of this is pair production.

Also, there is no increase of mass as the massive object accelerates. When a massive object approaches the speed of light, its energy approaches infinity (E = mγc2) and its momentum approaches infinity (p = mγv) but its mass is invariant under Lorentz transformation. You were probably taught that an objects "relativistic mass" increases to infinity (M = γm, such that E = Mc2) but this is an outdated notion, and doesn't really help our understanding of special relativity as much as it hinders it.

The only thing special about the speed of light SQUARED is that it is the scaling factor in translating between the MASS and object has and the REST ENERGY it has. This E = mc2 equation holds no information about the universal speed limit, or what happens to E, p, or m when you approach it. It also doesn't tell you what speeds need to be reached before mass can be transformed to energy, or vice-versa. It is simply a statement of rest energy. You need to dive more into the other equations of special relativity, Lorentz transformation and Minkowski space to understand more than what this flashy equation gives you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
12K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 127 ·
5
Replies
127
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K