Is the determinant a linear operation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EngWiPy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Linear
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether the determinant can be considered a linear operation, particularly in the context of expectation operators. Participants explore the relationships between determinants and expectations, including inequalities involving logarithms of determinants.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the equality \(\mathbb{E}[\text{det}]=\text{det}[\mathbb{E}]\) holds, suggesting initial skepticism.
  • Another participant asserts that the determinant is not a linear operation, citing the property that \(\text{det}(aM) = a \cdot \text{det}(M)\) and noting the lack of a simple relationship for \(\text{det}(M+N)\).
  • A participant introduces an inequality involving logarithms, questioning if a similar inequality holds for determinants and expectations.
  • Further, a participant provides a counterexample involving matrices with different determinants, illustrating that \(\mathbb{E}[\log \text{det}(H)]\) can differ significantly from \(\log \text{det}(\mathbb{E}[H])\), leading to a conclusion that the proposed inequality does not hold.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on whether the determinant can be treated as a linear operation in the context of expectations, with multiple competing views presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on specific examples and properties of determinants and expectations, but the discussion does not resolve the underlying mathematical complexities or assumptions involved.

EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Is the determinant a linear operation? I mean can we say that:

[tex]\mathbb{E}[\text{det}]=\text{det}[\mathbb{E}][/tex]

where E is the expectation operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First impression says no, but I'm testing it out now, I might be wrong.
 
No, it's not. For instance, det(aM) = andet(M). And det(M+N) doesn't have any simple relationship to det(M) and det(N). (See, for instance, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_determinant_lemma" .)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, now we have this inequality:

[tex]\mathbb{E}\left[\log(X)\right]\leq\log\left(\mathbb{E}[X]\right)[/tex]

Can we say in the same manner that:

[tex]\mathbb{E}\left[\log\left(\text{det}\left\{H\right\}\right)\right]\leq\log\left(\text{det}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[H\right]\right\}\right)[/tex]
 
S_David said:
Ok, now we have this inequality:

[tex]\mathbb{E}\left[\log(X)\right]\leq\log\left(\mathbb{E}[X]\right)[/tex]

Can we say in the same manner that:

[tex]\mathbb{E}\left[\log\left(\text{det}\left\{H\right\}\right)\right]\leq\log\left(\text{det}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[H\right]\right\}\right)[/tex]
Nope. Suppose H=((1 0), (0 1)) with 50% probability and ((-1 0), (0 -1)) with 50% probability. Both of those have determinant 1, so E[log det H] = 0. But E[H] = ((0 0), (0, 0)), with determinant 0, so log det E[H] = -infinity.
 
pmsrw3 said:
Nope. Suppose H=((1 0), (0 1)) with 50% probability and ((-1 0), (0 -1)) with 50% probability. Both of those have determinant 1, so E[log det H] = 0. But E[H] = ((0 0), (0, 0)), with determinant 0, so log det E[H] = -infinity.

Ok, I see. Thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K