Is the Electric Field of a Dipole Reversed on the Negative Z-Axis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the electric field of a dipole located at the origin, specifically its behavior on the negative z-axis. The electric field is derived using the formula \vec{\mathbf{E}}=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_o}\frac{1}{r^3}\left[\frac{3(\vec{p}\cdot \vec{r})\vec{r}}{r^2}-\vec{p}\right], leading to the conclusion that the electric field on the negative z-axis is \vec{\mathbf{E}}=-\frac{2p \hat{\mathbf{z}}}{4\pi \epsilon_o r^3}, which points in the negative z direction. A misunderstanding arises from incorrectly evaluating the denominator, specifically the absolute value of x in the context of the electric field calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric dipoles and their properties
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of the electric field equations and their derivations
  • Basic grasp of the concept of absolute values in mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the electric field for various dipole orientations
  • Learn about the implications of electric field directionality in dipole configurations
  • Explore the concept of absolute values in mathematical physics
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields in different coordinate systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as educators teaching electric field concepts and dipole behavior.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hi

I have a question about the electric field of a dipole located at the origin. We know that the
coordinate free form for the electric field of a dipole is

\vec{\mathbf{E}}=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_o}\frac{1}{r^3}\left[\frac{3(\vec{p}\cdot \vec{r})\vec{r}}{r^2}-\vec{p}\right]

Now let

\vec{r}= x\hat{\mathbf{x}}+y\hat{\mathbf{y}}+z\hat{\mathbf{z}}

be the vector of some point in space. Assume that \vec{p}=p(\hat{\mathbf{z}}).

So

\vec{p}\cdot \vec{r} = zp

so plugging everything we get for the electric field,

\vec{\mathbf{E}}=\frac{p}{4\pi \epsilon_o}\left[\frac{3z(x\hat{\mathbf{x}}+y\hat{\mathbf{y}}+z\hat{\mathbf{z}})-(x^2+y^2+z^2)\hat{\mathbf{z}}}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{5/2}}\right]

Now, if I want to get the electric field on the negative z axis, then I put x=y=0 and
z= -r , so I get

\vec{\mathbf{E}}=\frac{2p(-r)^2 \hat{\mathbf{z}}}{4\pi \epsilon_o(-r)^5}

which is after evaluating the brackets,

\vec{\mathbf{E}}=-\frac{2p \hat{\mathbf{z}}}{4\pi \epsilon_o r^3}

which points in the negative z direction, but if we look at the original formula for the
coordinate form of the electric field and then evaluate the electric field on the negative
z axis, it points toward the positive z direction. So what's happening here ?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your fallacy lies in evaluating the denominator. Note the following

\left(x^2\right)^{1/2} = |x|

and NOT x. That fixes your problem.
 
thanks prahar

how could i miss that ? :-p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K