Is the Electric Field Unique with Given Charge Density and Boundary Conditions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Griffiths
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the uniqueness of the electric field given a specific charge density and boundary conditions, particularly focusing on the implications of specifying either the potential V or its normal derivative on boundary surfaces.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the specified boundary conditions and the uniqueness of the electric field, questioning the relevance of the normal derivative in this context. Some suggest that theorems related to divergence and gradients may provide insights, while others express skepticism about their applicability.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the necessity of the normal derivative and its role in proving uniqueness. There is an indication of progress as one participant claims to have resolved their confusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem statement, which does not assume the boundaries are conductors or that V is constant over any surface. The implications of these assumptions are being examined.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Griffiths Problem 3.4

Homework Statement


Prove that the field is uniquelly determined when the charge density rho is given and either V or the normal derivative [itex]\frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{n}}[/itex] is specified on each boundary surface. Do not assume the boundaries are conductors, or that V is constant over any given surface.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


If you know V on the surface, this is the Corollary to the First Uniqueness Theorem. I don't see how knowing the normal derivative, [itex]\frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{n}}= \nabla{V}\cdot \hat{n}[/itex], helps at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess: probably one of those Stoke's theorems (curl, divergence, gradient) will simplify things.
 
The divergence theorem and Poisson's equation tell us that [tex]\int_{S} \nabla V \cdot \hat{n} da = \int_{V}\nabla ^2V d\tau = \int_{V}\rho/\epsilon_0 d\tau[/tex]. We know rho, so we didn't even need the normal derivative to get that integral. Thus, I don't see how the curl, divergence, gradient theorems will help.
 
anyone?
 
Never mind. I got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K