1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

How to find the charge density given by a Tricky Potential?

  1. Jan 17, 2016 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    I am trying to solve Problem 2.45 in Electrodynamics by Griffiths, however, my answers were different from those in the book, I am suspect I got a missing step but I could not find it, so here is the Given Problem

    Find the charge density [itex]\rho[/itex] given by a potential [tex]V=A\frac{e^{-\lambda r}}{r}[/tex] where [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]\lambda[/itex] are constant.

    2. Relevant equations

    [tex]E=-\nabla V[/tex] [tex]\nabla\cdot E = \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}[/tex]

    3. The attempt at a solution
    So what I did is, first, find for the E-field using: [tex]E=-\nabla V,[/tex] so [tex]E=-\hat{r}\frac{\partial }{\partial r} A\frac{e^{-\lambda r}}{r}[/tex] by employing chain rule, the E-field is now given by [tex]E= A\lambda\frac{ e^{-\lambda r}}{r}\hat{r}+A\frac{ e^{-\lambda r}}{r^2}\hat{r}.[/tex]

    Now, the charge density [itex]\rho[/itex] can be obtained thru [tex] \rho=\varepsilon_0\nabla\cdot E,[/tex] substituting the E-field to the equation, we will get [tex] \rho=\varepsilon_0\nabla\cdot \left [A\lambda\frac{ e^{-\lambda r}}{r}\hat{r}+A\frac{ e^{-\lambda r}}{r^2}\hat{r} \right ],[/tex] evaluating again using chain rule, we will get [tex]\rho=\varepsilon_0 \left [A\lambda e^{-\lambda r}\nabla\cdot\frac{\hat{r}}{r} +\frac{1}{r}\left( \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial }{\partial r} r^2 A\lambda e^{-\lambda r} \right ) + A\lambda e^{-\lambda r}\nabla\cdot\frac{\hat{r}}{r^2} +\frac{1}{r^2} \left( \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial }{\partial r} r^2 A e^{-\lambda r} \right ) \right ],[/tex] this will eventually become a bit more messy but the charge density will become [tex]\rho=A \varepsilon_0 e^{-\lambda r} [ 4\pi \delta^{3}(\mathbf{r})-\frac{\lambda^2}{r} ][/tex] however, this a bit different from Griffiths' answer of [tex]\rho=A \varepsilon_0 [ 4\pi \delta^{3}(\mathbf{r})-\frac{\lambda^2 e^{-\lambda r}}{r}][/tex]

    where did I went wrong?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 17, 2016 #2

    vela

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    Use the delta function property ##f(x)\delta(x) = f(0)\delta(x)##.
     
  4. Jan 18, 2016 #3
    OMG! That was just the best!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted