I Is the Equation h = u + (0.185)Pv Accurate for Converting Energy Units?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wrenchtime
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The equation h = u + (0.185)Pv is proposed for converting energy units, where h and u are in Btu/lbm, P in psia, and v in ft³/lbm. It represents the relationship between enthalpy and internal energy, with (0.185)Pv signifying the area between their curves on a temperature and specific entropy graph. Testing indicates the equation is effective across various mediums, with a conversion factor of 1 foot pound equating to 0.00129 BTU. The metric equivalent of the equation is h = u + (1000)Pv, using kg/kJ for h and u, MPa for P, and m³/kg for v. The discussion confirms the equation's accuracy for energy unit conversion.
wrenchtime
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Should h = u + Pv

be h = u + (0.185)Pv (Btu/lbm)

where units for h and u are (Btu/lbm)

P (psia) and v (ft*3/lbm)

On a Temperature and specific entropy graph

h... represents the area under the curve at a constant specific pressure

u... represents the area under the curve at a constant specific volume

(0.185)Pv... represents the area between the h and u curves

I have tested the equation on several medium and it seems to work?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Here’s a hint: 1 foot pound = 0.00129 BTU
 
To convert (psia) x (ft3 / lbm) to Btu / lbm

1 Btu / lbm = (1 lbf/in2) x (1 ft3/lbm) x (1 Btu/778 ft-lbf) x (144 in2/ 1 ft2) = 0.185 Btu/lbm

The equation in metric units is

h = u + (1000) P v

With units
h = kg /kj
u = kg /kj
P = Mpa
v = m3/kg
 
Measuring the temperatures of bright (visible spectrum) cosmic objects would use spectral analysis. But temperatures of IR (warm / hot) radiators is done using Stefan's Law with radiometric cameras. There seems no reason why suitable filters couldn't be used to find the black body temperature using the ratio of two measured intensities after the fashion of colour TV cameras. Why? Could it be to do with the actual size of IR filters to mount on a two channel image sensor array? I'm sure there...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
323
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K