Is the Function f[x_] := x + 2 Truly Linear?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter toofle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Linearity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f[x_] := x + 2 is not linear in the context of linear algebra due to its failure to meet the criteria of additivity and homogeneity of degree 1. While it represents a straight line in elementary algebra, it does not qualify as a linear operator as defined in higher mathematics. The distinction lies in the terminology used; "linear" in high school mathematics refers to graphs that are straight lines, while in linear algebra, it denotes functions that pass through the origin and satisfy specific properties. Understanding this difference is crucial for accurate mathematical communication.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear functions in elementary algebra
  • Familiarity with linear operators in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of the properties of functions, specifically additivity and homogeneity
  • Basic concepts of polynomials and their graphical representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear functions in linear algebra
  • Learn about the differences between linear functions and linear operators
  • Explore the concept of linearity in higher mathematics
  • Investigate the implications of non-homogeneous functions in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching algebra and linear algebra, and anyone interested in the distinctions between elementary and advanced mathematical concepts.

toofle
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Probably I'm just being stupid but:
According to Wikipedia.

* Additivity (also called the superposition property): f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y). This says that f is a group homomorphism with respect to addition.
* Homogeneity of degree 1: f(αx) = αf(x) for all α.


f[x_] := x + 2;
f[3 + 7]
f[3] + f[7]
5*f[10]
f[5*10]

12
14
60
52

which indicates x+2 is not linear but obv it is a linear function. Where is the error?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is no error. You are talking about two different things. The "linear function" defined in elementary algebra or PreCalculus is not the same as the "linear operators" or "linear functions" defined in linear algebra or abstract algebra.

For one, thing, if you have a "linear function", f, from R^1 to R^2, its "image", the set of all points in R^2 that are given by f(t), would be a straight line through the origin. The graph of a linear equation in the "elementary" sense (the set of points in R^2 (x, f(x))) is a straight line not necessarily through the origin. In linear algebra, we would call the first a "linear subs-space" of R^2 and the second a "linear manifold".
 
So how is linearity defined for high-school mathematics?

I've done linear algebra and calculus(one and several variables) though. For a function
f[x]=x+2, how is linearity defined.
 
toofle said:
So how is linearity defined for high-school mathematics?

I've done linear algebra and calculus(one and several variables) though. For a function
f[x]=x+2, how is linearity defined.

As you said in your first post, linearity of a function or operator means the function/operator has the following properties:

f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y),
f(ax) = af(x)

As HallsofIvy already mentioned, when calling a function such as "y = x+2" linear, the word linear is being used in a different sense than the above definition (as you already noticed that 'linear' polynomials with a non-zero constant don't satisfy the conditions of linearity!). The reason such functions are called 'linear' is because they are lines, which is the root of the word linear. You should be able to figure out from context which sense of the word is being used. If talking about mx + b type lines, it likely just means "lines". If talking about linear algebra or things like the derivative or integral being linear operations, it is referring to the definition at the start of the post.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K