Is the Given Function a Valid Electromagnetic Plane Wave?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HPRF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition Wave
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The expression B=kBzei(kzz-wt) is analyzed to determine its validity as an electromagnetic plane wave. The divergence of the magnetic field, represented as divB, must equal zero for the function to be valid. The calculation shows that divB=ikzBzei(kzz-wt), which is not zero, indicating that the given function does not satisfy the necessary condition for a valid electromagnetic plane wave. The correct representation of the magnetic field should be the real part of the complex field, denoted as \tilde{\textbf{B}}=\hat{\mathbf{k}}\tilde{B}_ze^{i(k_z z- \omega t)}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically divergence
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their application in physics
  • Experience with Maxwell's equations and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of electromagnetic waves in free space
  • Learn about the implications of divergence in vector fields
  • Explore the relationship between complex and real fields in electromagnetism
  • Investigate the conditions for validity of electromagnetic wave functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as educators teaching advanced topics in wave theory and vector calculus.

HPRF
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



By considering divergence, show whether the expression

B=kBzei(kzz-wt)

is a valid function for an electromagnetic plane wave.

Homework Equations



divB=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I have found divB=ikzBzei(kzz-wt).

Does this satisfy divB=0 because it is imaginary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The field you give is usually denoted as

[tex]\tilde{\textbf{B}}=\hat{\mathbf{k}}\tilde{B}_ze^{i(k_z z- \omega t)}[/tex]

and is itself complex-valued... The actual magnetic field [itex]\textbf{B}[/itex] is taken to be the real part of [tex]\tilde{\textbf{B}}[/itex] and so<br /> <br /> [tex]\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\textbf{B}=\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\text{Re}\left[\tilde{\textbf{B}}\right]=0[/tex]<br /> <br /> So, only if the divergence <i>of the real part</i> of the field you gave vanishes, can it be a valid magnetic field (The fact that the magnetic field is polarized in the same direction as the propagation should give you a little bit of hesitation here).[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K