How Does Polarization Affect Electromagnetic Wave Scattering by a Free Electron?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the scattering of a plane monochromatic electromagnetic wave, polarized in the x-direction and propagating in the z-direction, by a free electron initially at rest. Participants are exploring the implications of polarization on the scattering process and the associated mathematical expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the denominator in the expression for the cross section, questioning whether it relates to the magnitude of the Poynting vector or energy flux. There is also discussion about the energy density and its relation to the Poynting vector.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing hints and exploring different aspects of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Newton's second law to relate acceleration to the electric field, and suggestions have been made about averaging over polarization states. However, there is no explicit consensus on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the need to average over initial and final polarization states, and the implications of the electromagnetic wave's properties in the context of scattering. There are indications of missing information regarding the exact form of the electric field in the denominator.

Pi-Bond
Messages
300
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A plane monochromatic electromagnetic wave (polarized in x-direction and propagating in the z direction) is scattered by a free electron initially at rest.

vrbthg.png


Homework Equations



\vec{E}=E_0 \exp(i(kz-wt)) \hat{x}
\vec{B}=\frac{E_0}{c} \exp(i(kz-wt)) \hat{y}

The Attempt at a Solution



For part (iv), the numerator of the cross section is the expression given. I'm not sure about the denominator...is it magnitude of the Poynting vector? I'm confused what "energy flux" exactly means in this context.

I have not started (v), yet, but will once (iv) is clarified.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The incident energy really is something like ε0E2,where E is the incident electric field for which you can take any given form.Also for calculating next one you have to take an average over initial polarization and final polarization states is calculated with angle θ given for two polarizations and then summed for getting the full cross section.
 
Last edited:
Isn't \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_0 E^2 the energy density in J/m3?

The Poynting vector has the same units as Energy/Time/Area, as required in the denominator. The question said electromagnetic wave, so I assumed there was a magnetic component as well. That's the reason I was thinking about the Poynting vector.
 
sure,that is why there is no factor of 1/2 but 1(1/2 from electric and 1/2 from magnetic) and also multiply by c to get right units.
 
Ah ok, that makes sense. But how do I get the quantity in the denominator then?
 
Hey,sorry for being late but I will not be able to come here for some more days.However I will give enough hints so that you can solve this(Mentors if find any thing then delete it).Now the E electric field which contains in denominator need not be known.Just use Newtons second law to find acceleration(a) in terms of E(that is very simple).use that a to put in numerator,you will see E will be canceled.Now for the next part,the cross section will contain |ε*.ε0|2 term,where ε* for outgoing wave and other ε for incoming one.you will have to take average over the incident one.which will lie in xy plane.just choose it along x-axis say.Also for ε* take two polarization perpendicular to outgoing wave which should be perpendicular to each other also.For example,take first one in the plane defined by incident wave and outgoing wave and second one perpendicular to this plane.Take average over azimuth \phi to solve it.Good luck.
edit-Just one polarization is taken for incident one,but this one will be averaged.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K