Is the Goldbach Conjecture Finally Proven? New Proof on arXiv Sparks Debate

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eddybob123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, published on arXiv on March 18, has sparked significant debate regarding its validity. Key concerns include the author's background as an Electrical Engineer rather than a mathematician, lack of prior publications in pure mathematics, the absence of LaTeX formatting, and reliance on Wikipedia and MathWorld for references. These factors raise substantial doubts about the proof's legitimacy, leading many to advocate for professional journal publication before further consideration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Goldbach Conjecture
  • Familiarity with academic publishing standards
  • Knowledge of mathematical proof structures
  • Experience with LaTeX for mathematical documentation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the history and significance of the Goldbach Conjecture
  • Explore the standards for publishing mathematical papers in peer-reviewed journals
  • Learn about the importance of LaTeX in presenting mathematical proofs
  • Investigate the role of credible references in academic writing
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, academic researchers, and students interested in number theory and the validation of mathematical proofs will benefit from this discussion.

eddybob123
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
Hi, I found this proof on arxiv just yesterday, though it was published on March 18. I don't know if it is right, but can you guys check it? Is it right?
http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.4649
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1) The person is not a mathematician, but an Electrical Engineer
2) He hasn't published any paper in pure mathematics
3) The paper is not written in LaTeX
4) He references wikipedia and mathworldThese four points together make me doubt very much that the proof is valid. Of course, maybe the proof is valid, but I'm really not going to bother with reading it until a professional journal publishes it.
The above 4 points are usually enough to separate a genuine paper from a false paper.
 
I guess you're right...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
615
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K