Riemann Hypothesis and Goldbach Conjecture Proof?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around two recent papers posted on arXiv that claim to address the Riemann Hypothesis and Goldbach Conjecture, with a focus on the author's purported invention of a new number system. Participants are evaluating the credibility of the papers and the author's background.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the credibility of the papers due to the author's lack of affiliation with established academic institutions.
  • Others clarify that posting on arXiv requires endorsement or institutional affiliation, suggesting the author may have some legitimacy.
  • One participant notes that the author has previously published a paper in 2007 but has been inactive for several years before these recent submissions.
  • There is a consensus that the papers are not peer-reviewed, which raises concerns about their reliability.
  • A suggestion is made for participants to read the papers themselves and discuss any issues they find in the forums.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the credibility of the author and the papers, with some defending the possibility of the author's legitimacy while others remain skeptical. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the validity of the claims made in the papers.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of peer review and caution against taking unverified claims at face value, highlighting the need for careful reading of arXiv submissions.

Oriako
Messages
107
Reaction score
1
Hey guys,
I saw these just showed up on arXiv, published by some unknown who claims to have invented his own number system and is not affiliated with any academic institutions.

What do you make of this?
http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3465
http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2952
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Eh...keep in mind that anyone can post on arXiv. I'll wait until he survives peer review.
 
Actually, I don't think just anyone can post on arxiv. I believe you need an endorser or some such thing before you can post anything, or you need to be part of an institution whose members get automatically endorsed. As for the author in question, it appears he is actually affiliated with the Institute of Chemical Processing Machinery, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, according to the very end of the papers. I also didn't see anything about inventing his own number system, but then I only barely the skimmed over the papers.
 
Mute said:
Actually, I don't think just anyone can post on arxiv. I believe you need an endorser or some such thing before you can post anything, or you need to be part of an institution whose members get automatically endorsed. As for the author in question, it appears he is actually affiliated with the Institute of Chemical Processing Machinery, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, according to the very end of the papers. I also didn't see anything about inventing his own number system, but then I only barely the skimmed over the papers.

He published a paper in 2007 on that, and then went dead silent for 4 years and now published these.
 
Mute said:
Actually, I don't think just anyone can post on arxiv. I believe you need an endorser or some such thing before you can post anything, or you need to be part of an institution whose members get automatically endorsed. As for the author in question, it appears he is actually affiliated with the Institute of Chemical Processing Machinery, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, according to the very end of the papers. I also didn't see anything about inventing his own number system, but then I only barely the skimmed over the papers.

It's not peer reviewed. A lot of those articles are only there because they're waiting for acceptance from a journal. It doesn't mean arXiv isn't a wonderful resource, it just means you need to be more careful than usual when reading a paper.
 
The paper is a mathematics paper, not a physics/biology/chemistry paper.

If you really want to put in the effort, just read it and if you think something is up post the issue in the forums and you're bound to get someone familiar with that issue in some regard comment on it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
616
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K