Is the Graviton Really Massless?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FeDeX_LaTeX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitons Massless
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of the graviton, specifically whether it is truly massless, and explores related concepts of massless particles like photons. Participants examine the implications of masslessness for particle behavior, particularly in relation to the speed of light, and the application of Newtonian dynamics versus relativistic physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the graviton is massless, similar to the photon, which allows it to travel at the speed of light.
  • Others question the implications of masslessness, particularly whether a particle must have a mass of zero to reach the speed of light, and how this relates to massive particles like electrons.
  • There is a discussion about the definition of 'massless' and whether it implies a mass so small that it is effectively zero.
  • Some participants argue that applying Newton's second law (F = ma) to massless particles like photons is inappropriate, suggesting that Einstein's theory of relativity is necessary for accurate descriptions.
  • One participant emphasizes that while the photon is considered massless, experiments can only show that its mass is less than a certain value, not definitively zero.
  • There is a disagreement regarding the validity of Newtonian dynamics for massless particles, with some asserting that the rate of change of momentum still applies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of masslessness for particle behavior and the applicability of Newtonian dynamics to massless particles. No consensus is reached on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion involves complexities related to definitions of mass, the limitations of classical mechanics in describing massless particles, and the experimental uncertainties in measuring particle mass.

FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13
I was just reading a Wikipedia article about a hypothetical particle known as the graviton. It stated that it was massless -- but how is this possible? I thought that every particle has to have a mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it would be massless. So is the photon. In the standard model, all particles are massless, but they appear massive because of their interactions with the hypothetical Higgs particle.

Torquil
 
Photons are particles that don't have mass, and that enables them to travel at the speed of light. :wink:
 
So a particle has to have a mass of 0 to reach the speed of light on the dot?

An electron has a mass of 9.11*10^-31 kg... is that why we say that an electron can get very close to the speed of light, but not exactly to the speed of light?

Also, when we say 'massless', do we mean the mass is so small that it is 0? I am probably wrong...

EDIT: Just did a google search on photon mass and it yields '0'. So if F = ma, then;

F/a = m

F/a = 0

So F/a must be 0? Confused...

http://www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/625-2.html - this article also seems to be talking about the limit of a photon mass...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FeDeX_LaTeX said:
So a particle has to have a mass of 0 to reach the speed of light on the dot?

An electron has a mass of 9.11*10^-31 kg... is that why we say that an electron can get very close to the speed of light, but not exactly to the speed of light?

It is why it cannot move at the speed of light. But any massive particle can get arbitrarily close to the speed of light. The higher the mass, the more energy is needed to reach a given speed. Massless particles move atthe speed of light in a vaccuum. Massive particles move at any speed less than the speed of light.

Also, when we say 'massless', do we mean the mass is so small that it is 0? I am probably wrong...

EDIT: Just did a google search on photon mass and it yields '0'. So if F = ma, then;

F/a = m

F/a = 0

So F/a must be 0? Confused...

Photon movement is out of the domain of Newtonian dynamics. So it doesn't make sense to apply Newtons law as you have written it to a photon. To describe movements of massless particles, you need to apply Einsteins theory of relativity.

http://www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/625-2.html - this article also seems to be talking about the limit of a photon mass...

This means that experiments have shown that the poton mass is less than some experimentally observed amount. The accepted theory says that the photon is massless, so theory and experiment are consistent. Everything must be checked experimentally, and experiments always have uncertainties, so it would not show directly that m=0 for a photon. Experiments will never determine that the mass of the photon is exactly zero, because that is impossible.

Torquil
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FeDeX_LaTeX said:
So a particle has to have a mass of 0 to reach the speed of light on the dot?

Yes! :smile:

(or rather, it doesn't reach the speed of light, it can only be at the speed of light :wink:)
Also, when we say 'massless', do we mean the mass is so small that it is 0? I am probably wrong...

No, we mean the mass (the rest-mass, of course) actually is zero.
EDIT: Just did a google search on photon mass and it yields '0'. So if F = ma, then;

F/a = m

F/a = 0

So F/a must be 0? Confused...
torquil said:
Photon movement is out of the domain of Newtonian dynamics. So it doesn't make sense to apply Newtons law as you have written it to a photon. To describe movements of massless particles, you need to apply Einsteins theory of relativity.

No, I disagree.

This is the danger of using the "easy" version of Newton's second law … F = ma

The official version is "force = rate of change of momentum", or F = dp/dt.

For an ordinary particle, m ≠ 0, and so p = mv, and therefore F = dp/dt = ma.

For a photon, m = 0, but the Newtonian F = dp/dt is still valid. :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
No, I disagree.

This is the danger of using the "easy" version of Newton's second law … F = ma

The official version is "force = rate of change of momentum", or F = dp/dt.

For an ordinary particle, m ≠ 0, and so p = mv, and therefore F = dp/dt = ma.

For a photon, m = 0, but the Newtonian F = dp/dt is still valid. :smile:

Agreed! :smile:

Torquil
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K