What's the difference between the Higgs boson and the hypothetical graviton particle? Do they both have to do with the mass of matter? I guess what I'm trying to ask is how are the Higgs particle and the graviton related.
you are correct on the first one.The gravitons carry the energy away in the form of "gravitational wave"(the recent LIGO experiment as an example), however, the "virtual gravitons" are responsible for the gravitational force.putongren said:Radium, I had a hard time understanding your post. I just want to check if my understanding is correct. The Higgs boson "causes" inertial mass in certain sub atomic particles, while the graviton carries the gravitational force. Is that correct?
No. This is simply not how the world or physics works. You cannot take some words that look nice together and base your theory on it.putongren said:If Einstein said that inertial and gravitational masses are equivalent due to the Equivalence principle, wouldn't the Higgs boson and the graviton be equivalent also?
Isn't this reversed reasoning? As I see it, you use the equivalence of inertial and grav.mass to reason that gravity is geometrical. But the reason why they are both equivalent, we don't know.Orodruin said:No. This is simply not how the world or physics works. You cannot take some words that look nice together and base your theory on it.
And that is not what the equivalence principle says. It says it is always possible to find a local inertial frame. It explains the observation from classical physics that inertial and gravitational masses are equal.
This might have been the historical path, but I have always seen it the other way around. Because gravity is geometrical, "gravitational mass" is just the inertia in an accelerating frame.haushofer said:Isn't this reversed reasoning? As I see it, you use the equivalence of inertial and grav.mass to reason that gravity is geometrical. But the reason why they are both equivalent, we don't know.
It does, sort of, it leads to a Yukawa interaction between all particles with mass, with coupling constants given by their mass. Jester discussed it in more detail.haushofer said:One confusion people sometimes have, is that because the Higgs particle is a boson, it should carry a force. This is not the case.
This is wrong...radium said:The Higg's boson as a fundamental particle gives the bosons mediating the electroweak force mass
The Higgs Boson is a subatomic particle that is theorized to give mass to other particles in the universe. It was first discovered in 2012 at the Large Hadron Collider in CERN. The Graviton is a hypothetical particle that is believed to be responsible for the force of gravity.
The Higgs Boson has a mass and interacts with other particles to give them mass, while the Graviton is believed to be massless and only interacts with particles through the force of gravity.
The discovery of the Higgs Boson confirmed the existence of the Higgs field, which is a fundamental part of the Standard Model of particle physics. It also helps explain the origin of mass in the universe.
The Higgs Boson was detected through its decay products in experiments at the Large Hadron Collider. The Graviton has not yet been detected, but its existence is predicted by theories such as general relativity and quantum mechanics.
Understanding the Higgs Boson and the Graviton could lead to advancements in fields such as particle physics, cosmology, and quantum gravity. It could also potentially lead to new technologies and innovations in the future.