- 436
- 13
I was just reading a Wikipedia article about a hypothetical particle known as the graviton. It stated that it was massless -- but how is this possible? I thought that every particle has to have a mass.
Is the Graviton Really Massless?
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
torquil
- 648
- 2
Yes it would be massless. So is the photon. In the standard model, all particles are massless, but they appear massive because of their interactions with the hypothetical Higgs particle.
Torquil
Torquil
- 25,837
- 258
Photons are particles that don't have mass, and that enables them to travel at the speed of light. 
- 436
- 13
So a particle has to have a mass of 0 to reach the speed of light on the dot?
An electron has a mass of 9.11*10^-31 kg... is that why we say that an electron can get very close to the speed of light, but not exactly to the speed of light?
Also, when we say 'massless', do we mean the mass is so small that it is 0? I am probably wrong...
EDIT: Just did a google search on photon mass and it yields '0'. So if F = ma, then;
F/a = m
F/a = 0
So F/a must be 0? Confused...
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/625-2.html - this article also seems to be talking about the limit of a photon mass...
An electron has a mass of 9.11*10^-31 kg... is that why we say that an electron can get very close to the speed of light, but not exactly to the speed of light?
Also, when we say 'massless', do we mean the mass is so small that it is 0? I am probably wrong...
EDIT: Just did a google search on photon mass and it yields '0'. So if F = ma, then;
F/a = m
F/a = 0
So F/a must be 0? Confused...
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/625-2.html - this article also seems to be talking about the limit of a photon mass...
Last edited by a moderator:
torquil
- 648
- 2
FeDeX_LaTeX said:
It is why it cannot move at the speed of light. But any massive particle can get arbitrarily close to the speed of light. The higher the mass, the more energy is needed to reach a given speed. Massless particles move atthe speed of light in a vaccuum. Massive particles move at any speed less than the speed of light.
Photon movement is out of the domain of Newtonian dynamics. So it doesn't make sense to apply Newtons law as you have written it to a photon. To describe movements of massless particles, you need to apply Einsteins theory of relativity.
This means that experiments have shown that the poton mass is less than some experimentally observed amount. The accepted theory says that the photon is massless, so theory and experiment are consistent. Everything must be checked experimentally, and experiments always have uncertainties, so it would not show directly that m=0 for a photon. Experiments will never determine that the mass of the photon is exactly zero, because that is impossible.
Torquil
Last edited by a moderator:
- 25,837
- 258
FeDeX_LaTeX said:
Yes!
(or rather, it doesn't reach the speed of light, it can only be at the speed of light
)No, we mean the mass (the rest-mass, of course) actually is zero.
torquil said:
No, I disagree.
This is the danger of using the "easy" version of Newton's second law … F = ma
The official version is "force = rate of change of momentum", or F = dp/dt.
For an ordinary particle, m ≠ 0, and so p = mv, and therefore F = dp/dt = ma.
For a photon, m = 0, but the Newtonian F = dp/dt is still valid.
torquil
- 648
- 2
tiny-tim said:No, I disagree.
This is the danger of using the "easy" version of Newton's second law … F = ma
The official version is "force = rate of change of momentum", or F = dp/dt.
For an ordinary particle, m ≠ 0, and so p = mv, and therefore F = dp/dt = ma.
For a photon, m = 0, but the Newtonian F = dp/dt is still valid.
Agreed!
Torquil