Is the higgs field the same as spacetime foam?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between the Higgs field and spacetime foam, exploring whether they are the same entity or concept. Participants delve into the nature of spacetime foam, its theoretical implications, and the characteristics of the Higgs field, with a focus on foundational particles and quantum energy.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of comparing the Higgs field and spacetime foam, suggesting that the analogy does not hold due to differing characteristics.
  • One participant emphasizes the need to clarify what "spacetime foam" means, noting that speculative theories exist regarding its nature and relevance to the universe.
  • Another participant argues that while both the Higgs field and spacetime foam exist everywhere, this does not imply they are the same thing.
  • There is a discussion about the smallest particles in the universe, with one participant suggesting that the Higgs field could represent these fundamental quanta.
  • Some participants assert that spacetime foam should not be considered a "quantum of energy" and express concerns about the formulation of personal theories without a solid understanding of established physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the Higgs field and spacetime foam, with no consensus reached. Some argue for a clear distinction, while others explore potential connections, leading to a contested discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the speculative nature of theories regarding spacetime foam and the importance of understanding established physics before proposing new ideas. There are references to the Standard Model and the nature of elementary particles, indicating a complex interplay of concepts.

tybeedave
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
if not, what is it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Is an apple the same as blue?
The question does not make sense.
 
mfb said:
Is an apple the same as blue?
The question does not make sense.
So you are saying that the spacetime foam isn't even related to the highs field?...I'm not trying to yank your chain...I thought they both were based on an all everywhere type of thing.
 
First you have to clarify what "the spacetime foam" is supposed to mean. There are some speculative theories that predict that spacetime is not continuous. It is unclear if those theories have any relevance to our universe at all. There are established theories that predict other effects at small scales that might be called "spacetime foam", without completely breaking spacetime. All this has no special relation to the Higgs field. Sure, the Higgs field is in spacetime. So is the electromagnetic field. And the other fields of the constituents of an apple. All those fields exist everywhere.
 
tybeedave said:
So you are saying that the spacetime foam isn't even related to the highs field?...I'm not trying to yank your chain...I thought they both were based on an all everywhere type of thing.

I'm questioning your logic here. Even if they are both the "all everywhere type of thing", why would that characteristics alone imply that they are the same thing? That's like saying since a cow and an apple are both edible, they are the same thing.

Zz.
 
I see what your saying, and, I'm not illogical. I'm trying to determine the character of and to understand quantum energy...by that, I mean the smallest individual, non-trivial particles that form the foundation of the universe, what I referred to in my question as spacetime foam. It had occurred to me that the higgs field could be these smallest of quanta.
 
Also, since energy and mass are equivalent, all particles are would seem to be related, even cows and apples...
 
Actually, you are being somewhat illogical. You are trying to develop your own theories (which, BTW, is not what PF is for) before understanding what has come before. Is that logical?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
tybeedave said:
I mean the smallest individual, non-trivial particles that form the foundation of the universe
According to the Standard Model, those are the elementary particles we know - electrons, quarks, gluons, Higgs and so on. On the other hand, the fields look more fundamental than the particles.
tybeedave said:
It had occurred to me that the higgs field could be these smallest of quanta.
No.
 
  • #10
I'm not sure if I understand your question right. You say that the higgsfield itself is the quantum foam in Spacetime of the superscalarfield?

If this is your question, then NO.
 
  • #11
tybeedave said:
I see what your saying, and, I'm not illogical. I'm trying to determine the character of and to understand quantum energy...by that, I mean the smallest individual, non-trivial particles that form the foundation of the universe, what I referred to in my question as spacetime foam. It had occurred to me that the higgs field could be these smallest of quanta.

Spacetime foam is NOT a "quantum of energy". I don't believe you understand the physics involved in any of this. Is this correct?

You can't simply try to formulate an idea when you do not have a good understanding of the various components that make up that idea. This is not only illogical, it is also irrational.

And has been stated, per the PF Rules that you had agreed to, personal theory such as this is forbidden. You're welcome to try and learn what the Higgs field is, what "spacetime foam" is, etc.. etc. But if you try to attempt at selling your own theory, you might have a very rough time on this forum.

Zz.
 
  • #12
ZapperZ said:
Spacetime foam is NOT a "quantum of energy". I don't believe you understand the physics involved in any of this. Is this correct?

You can't simply try to formulate an idea when you do not have a good understanding of the various components that make up that idea. This is not only illogical, it is also irrational.

And has been stated, per the PF Rules that you had agreed to, personal theory such as this is forbidden. You're welcome to try and learn what the Higgs field is, what "spacetime foam" is, etc.. etc. But if you try to attempt at selling your own theory, you might have a very rough time on this forum.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Is the false vacuum theory not well accepted?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate Inertial mass, the Higgs field, and Mach's Principle
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Undergrad Number of Higgs "particles" per unit volume
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Undergrad Is Connes' Model of the Higgs Field a Wormhole?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
High School Is space-time curvature a curvature of the Higgs field?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
High School Higgs field and nuclear reactions
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Graduate Higgs inflation and quadratic gravity
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Undergrad Does the Higgs Field Consist of Higgs Bosons?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Undergrad Is the Higgs field in its present form phlogiston-like?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Graduate "Monstrous Higgs and Leech Spacetime"
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K