Is the Induction Hypothesis n^2 - n + 41 Prime for All Natural Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mbcsantin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the induction hypothesis that the expression n² - n + 41 yields a prime number for all natural numbers n. A counterexample is provided by evaluating the expression at n = 41, resulting in 41², which is not prime. The conclusion drawn is that the hypothesis is false, as it fails for at least one natural number. The discussion emphasizes the importance of not assuming the conclusion in proofs and clarifies the method of finding counterexamples.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with prime numbers and their properties
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of polynomial expressions
  • Knowledge of logical reasoning in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study mathematical induction techniques in detail
  • Explore properties of prime numbers and their distributions
  • Learn about polynomial functions and their behavior
  • Investigate common proof strategies and how to avoid logical fallacies
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory or mathematical proofs will benefit from this discussion.

mbcsantin
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For all n is an element of N, n2 - n + 41 is prime
N= natural numbers


Homework Equations



None.

The Attempt at a Solution



Let n=1
12 - 1 + 41 = 41 is prime.

n2 - n + 41 is not prime. so this hypothesis is not correct.
assume n2 - n + 41 is not prime. there exist n that let n2 - n + 41 = n2 so n2 - n + 41 is not prime.
therefore, when 41-n=0 this equation holds. therefore there exists a n=41 that n2 - n + 41 is not prime.
Hence n2 - n + 41 not true for all n is an element of N.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the right idea, that when n = 41, n^2 - n + 41 is not prime.

Your proof doesn't make sense though. You can't begin by assuming the intended conclusion. It's not clear why there exists an n such that n^2 - n + 41 = n^2 and that this number is not prime. Work on articulating what you mean.
 
That's not supposed to be a "proof" of anything. It's a perfectly valid way of finding a counter example to the supposed theorem. The "proof" that the theorem is false is simply asserting that if n= 41, n^2- n+ 41= 41^2 is NOT prime. How you got to n= 41 is not relevant to the proof.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K