Is the inner product a bilinear function in vector spaces?

Click For Summary
The inner product can be considered a bilinear function because it is linear in each argument when the other is held fixed, despite being conjugate linear in one argument. However, not every mapping from a finite-dimensional vector space to its field qualifies as an inner product, as inner products have specific properties that not all mappings satisfy. In infinite-dimensional spaces, the situation is even more complex, and many mappings cannot be classified as inner products. The Reitz representation theorem is relevant when discussing linear functionals, but it does not imply that all mappings are inner products. Overall, while the inner product exhibits bilinear characteristics, it does not encompass all mappings in vector spaces.
quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have two questions that are fairly general, but slightly hazy to me still. o:)

1) Can we consider the inner product to be a bilinear function, or not? I would like to think of it as a mapping from an ordered pair of vectors of some vector space V (i.e. VxV) to the field (F), and I know by definition the inner product is conjugate linear as a function of it's first entry (or second, depending on which text you use). But isn't the inner product also linear as a function of either entry whenever the other is held fixed, making it bilinear?

2) Can every mapping from a finite dimensional vector space V to it's field be considered an inner product of something? What about the infinite dimensional case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Yes, obviously: what is a bilinear map?

2) No, equally obviously. If you allow mapping to mean linear functional then you need the Reitz representation theorem. But since very few vector spaces have inner products the answer is still 'NO', for equally obvious reasons.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K