Is the Kronecker delta linear?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter entropy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Linear
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
entropy1
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
72
I don't see how the kronecker delta function is linear, and hence I don't see how it can serve as a dual basis for a ket space.

How is the kronecker delta linear? How can it serve as a dual basis?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are different meanings of "linear" depending on the context. It seems you are mixing them up, as well as Dirac and Kronecker. The functions spanning a function space don't have to be linear, but the space is a linear space, because it consists of linear superpositions of those functions.

In case of the Dirac delta you don't even have a function however. But the associated functional that extracts a single value from a test function is linear.

Look up these concepts, maybe that will clear up your confusion.
 
I think I understand now. Thanks. I mistook the Kronecker delta for being defined 0 for any vector which was not a particular basevector, but in fact it is only defined such for certain basevectors. And the Kronecker delta is not a function. The functionals with the Kronecker delta property are. :wink:
 
Last edited:
New question:
What is the significance of a basis functional with respect to physical reality? :smile:
 
Last edited:
entropy1 said:
What is the significance of a basis functional with respect to physical reality? :smile:

I presume you mean basis vectors.

I think 'physical reality' is far too vague and undefined a concept to be of any value here.

Its value lies in the Born rule. If you expand the state |u> in terms of an observables O = Σyi |bi><bi| eigenvectors, |u> = Σ ci |bi>, the coefficients of that expansion, ci, give the probability of outcome i by |ci|^2.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
bhobba said:
I presume you mean basis vectors.
Nope, I ment basis functionals. But I guess I have to learn further to what eigenvectors are first. :wink: