Is the Moon there when nobody looks at it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RonLevy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the philosophical and scientific implications of whether the Moon exists when not observed, referencing Einstein's skepticism about observation-dependent reality. Participants explore the mathematics behind this idea, particularly Bell's Theorem and its relation to quantum mechanics, which suggests that particles do not have definite properties until measured. The conversation also touches on the nature of observation, questioning if devices like cameras count as "looking" and how this relates to macroscopic objects like the Moon. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the notion that while the Moon exists regardless of observation, quantum mechanics complicates the understanding of reality at the particle level. The debate highlights the distinction between macroscopic and microscopic realities in the context of quantum theory.
  • #61
I used the moon as an example to illustrate the same question in the Quantum Physics Section of PF.

quantumcarl said:
If no human has observed the moon or been able to calculate its existence through studying its physical effects... does the moon exist under the terms and formulations of quantum mechanics?

this got quite a few replies from some excellent sources on PF not unlike this thread!

Here's the thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=106188
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
I did a google search and I found this article
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~hpu/Phys311_source/mermin_moon.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
8K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K