Is the Pauli-Lubanski Vector Always Zero?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Pauli-Lubanski vector, specifically whether it is always zero. The user demonstrates that the expression for the Pauli-Lubanski vector, W0, simplifies to zero using the identity involving the angular momentum tensor J^{ab} and momentum P^c. The conclusion drawn is that W = 0 for all components, indicating that the Pauli-Lubanski vector is zero by definition for spin-0 particles. The conversation also highlights that this conclusion does not hold for particles with non-zero intrinsic spin.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum tensor J^{ab}
  • Familiarity with the Pauli-Lubanski vector W
  • Knowledge of the properties of partial derivatives
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics, particularly regarding spin
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Pauli-Lubanski vector for particles with non-zero intrinsic spin
  • Study the mathematical properties of the angular momentum tensor J^{ab}
  • Examine the role of the Pauli-Lubanski vector in quantum field theory
  • Explore the relationship between the Pauli-Lubanski vector and Lorentz invariance
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and particle physics, as well as students studying angular momentum and its implications in quantum field theory.

tamiry
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi
i've noticed that,
J^{ab}P^c + J^{bc}P^a+J^{ca}P^b = 0
[
Since
J^{ab}P^c + J^{bc}P^a+J^{ca}P^b = x^a\partial^b\partial^c -x^b\partial^a\partial^c + x^b\partial^c\partial^a-x^c\partial^b\partial^a+x^c\partial^a\partial^b-x^a\partial^c\partial^b = 0
]

Next, I tried it on the Pauli Lubanski vector. Suppose I'll look at W0 as an example
W_x = (1/2)\epsilon_{xabc}J^{ab}P^c
2W_0 = \epsilon_{0abc}J^{ab}P^c = \epsilon_{0123}J^{12}P^3+\epsilon_{0132}J^{13}P^2+\epsilon_{0231}J^{23}P^1+\epsilon_{0213}J^{21}P^3+\epsilon_{0312}J^{31}P^2+\epsilon_{0321}J^{32}P^1
= +J^{12}P^3-J^{13}P^2+J^{23}P^1-J^{21}P^3+J^{31}P^2-J^{32}P^1
= (J^{12}P^3+J^{23}P^1+J^{31}P^2)-(J^{13}P^2+J^{21}P^3+J^{32}P^1)
and in each parentheses we have an expression identical to the identity I started with.
Therefore, W0 = 0.

likewise I get for all the other W components. So, is W = 0 by definition?

Homework Equations


(none)

The Attempt at a Solution


the only thing I could have missed is the identity from above, but i looks quite solid. I don't see were did I go wrongthanks for your time
tamir
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could get to that conclusion faster by noticing that
$$
\epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho} (x_\nu \partial_\lambda - x_\lambda \partial_\nu) \partial_\rho ~=~ 0 ~,
$$because the partial derivatives commute.

But you're only considering orbital angular momentum, hence it only applies to a spin-0 particle. If there's non-zero intrinsic spin, things are different.

Check Wikipedia's entry on the Pauli--Lubanski vector.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K