Is the Relativistic Law for Adding Velocities Associative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NeroBlade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Relativistic
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
NeroBlade
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hey folks I've been having trouble solving this assignment and I'm not sure whether my solutions is correct or in the right direction.
The one question just need help doing the fraction rearranging to prove that the function is associative.

1. The Relativistic Law for adding velocities is v1 + v2 = (v1 + v2) / (1+((v1*v2)/c^2)) Show that:

Law is associative

I've thought of using (v1 + v2) + v3 = v1 + (v2 + v3) where

(v1 + v2) + v3 = ((v1 + v2)/(1 + (v1*v2/c^2)) + v3) / (1 + (((v1v2)/c^2)*v3) / c^2)

and

v1 + (v2 + v3) = ((v2 + v3)/(1 + (v2*v3/c^2)) + v1) / (1 + (((v2v3)/c^2)*v1) / c^2)

At this point I am stuck in regards of algebraically solving these two fractions.
Could any of you lend me a hand for this problem?

2.

v + c = c

I'm presume that you use one of the addition or multiplication axioms where the you either make v a neutral element
where you get to the point that v + c - c = 0 and v = 0 therefore v + c = 0 + c = c.

3.

If v1,v2 < c then v1 + v2 < c
For this one I've used the Relativistic Law and simulated what would happen if v1,v2 > c
(which is impossible as c is suppose to be the "Ultimate Velocity")
and work out c after for example v1 = 4, v2 = 5 and c = 2 and (v1 + v2)

How am I doing for these proofs are these right? If not what is missing?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiply both expressions by their common denominator
c²(v1v2+c²)(v2v3+c²) to clear all the fractions. It will be messy, but possible, to see if the numerators are equal by expanding them out and collecting like terms. Hard to believe they will be equal!