Is the Self Inductance of the Hairpin Loop Calculated Correctly?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The self-inductance of the hairpin loop, as derived from Griffiths problem 7.23, is calculated using the formula L = (μ₀ l / 2π) ln(d/ε). However, the discussion reveals an error where a factor of 1/2 is incorrectly included in the expression for L. The correct self-inductance should be L = (μ₀ l / π) ln(d/ε), as the contributions from both the top and bottom sections of the wire are equal and should not be halved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, specifically self-inductance
  • Familiarity with Griffiths' textbook on electromagnetism
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Basic concepts of magnetic flux and induced electromotive force (emf)
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of self-inductance for different loop geometries
  • Study the impact of wire radius on inductance calculations
  • Explore applications of self-inductance in circuit design
  • Learn about the role of magnetic fields in inductive components
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physicists working on circuit design, and engineers interested in inductive components will benefit from this discussion.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Griffiths problem 7.23
Copute the self inducatnce of the hairpin loop shown in the figure. (neglect contribution from ends since mosto f the flux comes form the straight section) To get a definite answer , assume the wire has a tiny radius epsilon, and ignore any flux through the wire itself


Homework Equations


[tex]\Phi = LI[/tex]
L = self inductance and I is the current through the loop
induced emf is
[tex]\epsilon = - L \frac{dI}{dt}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


ok the flux due to straight part on top is (and its legnth is l)
[tex]\Phi = \frac{\mu_{0} Il}{2 \pi} \int_{\epsilon}^{d} \frac{dr}{r} = \frac{\mu_{0} Il}{2 \pi} \ln \frac{d}{\epsilon}[/tex]

due to the bottom wire has the same value
so the total flux is
[tex]\Phi = \frac{\mu_{0} Il}{\pi} \ln \frac{d}{\epsilon}[/tex]

now the self indutance is then
[tex]L= \frac{\mu_{0} l}{2 \pi} \ln \frac{d}{\epsilon}[/tex]

is this correct??

Thanks for the help!
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    6.4 KB · Views: 639
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost. You have a magical 1/2 that shows up in your expression for L that shouldn't be there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K