Ling Min Hao
- 22
- 0
Is the series of numbers 2,3,5,8,13,21 ... a fibronacci sequence ? Because it doesn't start with 1 , but it fulfills the explicit formula .
The discussion centers around whether the series of numbers 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 can be classified as a Fibonacci sequence. Participants explore definitions, initial conditions, and the implications of generalized Fibonacci sequences.
Participants express differing views on the definition of a Fibonacci sequence, with no consensus reached on whether the series in question qualifies as such. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the classification of the series.
The discussion highlights the dependence on definitions and initial conditions when classifying sequences, as well as the potential for varying interpretations based on context.
How do you define a Fibonacci sequence?Ling Min Hao said:Is the series of numbers 2,3,5,8,13,21 ... a fibronacci sequence ? Because it doesn't start with 1 , but it fulfills the explicit formula .
I don't know , but from wikipedia , it says Fibronacci starts from either 0,1 or 1,1 but is 2,3,5,8,13,21... a Fibronacci sequence it remains unknown for me ..PeroK said:How do you define a Fibonacci sequence?
I guess it depends on author and purpose whether only the classical sequence is meant or all possible. I looked up "generalized Fibonacci sequence" and found, e.g. http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/hosted-sites/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibGen.htmlLing Min Hao said:I don't know , but from wikipedia , it says Fibonacci starts from either 0,1 or 1,1 but is 2,3,5,8,13,21... a Fibronacci sequence it remains unknown for me ..
A question like this is entirely definition dependent. If you allow a Fibonacci sequence to have any two initial terms, then it is. If not, then it's not. Or, in this case, it is simply not the full sequence.Ling Min Hao said:I don't know , but from wikipedia , it says Fibronacci starts from either 0,1 or 1,1 but is 2,3,5,8,13,21... a Fibronacci sequence it remains unknown for me ..