Is the square root of a prime number always going to be irrational?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on whether the square root of a prime number is always irrational. Participants explore this question through various mathematical arguments and proofs, touching on concepts related to irrational numbers and perfect squares.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the square root of a prime number is always irrational, framing it as a random inquiry.
  • Another participant asserts that the square root of any natural number that is not a perfect square is irrational.
  • A participant provides a detailed argument that if the square root of a prime \( p \) were rational, it would lead to contradictions regarding the properties of prime numbers and divisibility.
  • A further contribution includes a proof that assumes the existence of a rational square root for a prime and derives a contradiction, emphasizing the importance of a and b being relatively prime.
  • Some participants generalize the discussion to state that the nth root of any natural number that is not a perfect nth power is also irrational.
  • One participant expands on the nth root concept, suggesting that a rational number must have a perfect nth power in both the numerator and denominator to be rational when taking the nth root.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the square root of a prime number is irrational, supported by mathematical reasoning. However, there is no explicit consensus on the broader implications regarding nth roots and perfect powers, as some participants introduce generalizations that may not be universally accepted.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the properties of numbers and relies on definitions of rationality and perfect powers, which may not be universally agreed upon. Some mathematical steps and conditions are left unresolved.

Universe_Man
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
is the square root of a prime number always going to be irrational? just a random question.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I believe the square root of any natural number that is not a perfect square is irrational.
 
I would say yes, because let's denote our prime p. If [itex]\sqrt{p}=n[/itex], ([itex]n\in\mathbb{N}[/itex]), then it means that p=n² <==> p/n=n (i.e. n divides p ==> p is not prime: a contradiction with the hypothesis). If [itex]\sqrt{p}=m/n[/itex], ([itex]m,n \in \mathbb{N}[/itex], [itex]n\neq 0,1[/itex], then it means that p = m²/n², i.e. p is rationnal ==> p is not prime: a contradiction with the hypothesis. The only remaining possibility is that [itex]\sqrt{p}[/itex] is irrational.
 
Yes, you're both right.

Here's a proof of the prime case...

Suppose there exists a prime p such that [tex]\sqrt{p} \in \mathbb{Q}[/tex]

Then [tex]\sqrt{p} = \frac{a}{b} \[/tex] where [tex]p,q \in \mathbb{Z}[/tex]

Now, we can assume that a and b are relatively prime (ie the fraction is in lowest form). This is crucial for the remainder of the proof.

[tex]b \cdot \sqrt{p} = a[/tex]

[tex]b^{2} \cdot p = a^{2}[/tex]

From this last equation, we see that p divides a. Therefore, there exists some integer k such that a = pk. Substituting gives us:

[tex]b^{2} \cdot p = {(pk)}^{2} = p^{2} \cdot k^{2}[/tex]

Thus, [tex]b^{2} = p \cdot k^{2}[/tex]

Now, we have an equation that shows p divides b. So we have reached a contradiction. Since a and b were assumed to be relatively prime, they can't both possibly have p as a divisor. Therefore, no such integers a and b exist.
 
Last edited:
In general, I think that the nth root of any natural number that is not itself a perfect nth power is an irrational number.
 
BSMSMSTMSPHD said:
In general, I think that the nth root of any natural number that is not itself a perfect nth power is an irrational number.

This is true, and in fact the nth root of any rational number which doesn't have a perfect nth power in both the numerator and denominator (when written in lowest terms) is irrational. To see this (as I mentioned in another https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=129729"), just note that when you take the nth power of a rational number, you get a rational number with the above property. So conversely, a number which doesn't have this property can't be the nth power of a rational number.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K