MHB Is the Supremum of the Sum of Two Sets Equal to the Sum of their Suprema?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Let $A$ and $B$ be sets of real numbers and write $$C=\{x+y:x\in A,y\in B\}.$$ Find a relation among $\sup A$, $\sup B$, and $\sup C$.

My attempt:

I'm assuming the answer is $\sup C=\sup A+\sup B$.

$x\le \sup A\ \forall x\in A$
$y\le \sup B\ \forall y\in B$
$\implies x+y\le \sup A+\sup B$ $\forall x\in A,\ y\in B$

So, $\sup A+\sup B$ is an upper bound for $C$.

Suppose $\sup C\neq\sup A+\sup B$.

$\implies \exists l<\sup A+\sup B$ such that $x+y\le l$ $\forall x\in A,\ y\in B$

$\implies x\le l-y\ \forall x\in A,\ y\in B$

So, $l-y$ is an upper bound of $A\ \forall y\in B$

I feel that I'm on the right track but I don't know how to get a contradiction. Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Prove that $\sup A+\sup B-\varepsilon$ is not an upper bound of $C$ for any $\varepsilon>0$. For this find a $c\in C$ such that $c>\sup A+\sup B-\varepsilon$.
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top