Is the Twin Prime Conjecture Finally Proven? A Scientist's Perspective

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a proposed proof of the Twin Prime Conjecture, examining the validity of the proof and identifying errors within it. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and peer review of the proof's claims.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a proof of the Twin Prime Conjecture.
  • Another participant identifies two crucial errors in the proof, noting that one is significant while the other is minor.
  • A request is made for clarification on the identified mistakes.
  • The original proposer acknowledges a small mistake in the proof related to the fraction 2/15 N, stating that it should be deleted but claims it does not affect the overall reasoning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the validity of the proof, as there are identified errors and differing opinions on their impact.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the proof's assumptions and the dependence on specific mathematical expressions, which remain unresolved.

MrAwojobi
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Here is my proof of the 'Twin Prime Conjecture'.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Attachment approved.
 
Two crucial errors appear on page 4. Oddly, the big mistake doesn't matter while the small mistake ruins the proof.
 
Can you please highlight the mistakes. Many thanks
 
I acknowledge that a small mistake has been made in my proof which doesn't actually affect the reasoning behind the proof. The mistake is where the fraction 2/15 N is shown. This fraction is incorrect and should be deleted.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Monumental Proof Settles Geometric Langlands Conjecture
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Graduate Proof of the twin primes conjecture
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Graduate An approach to the Twin Prime Conjecture
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
Graduate Our Old Friend, the Twin Primes Conjecture
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Graduate Is It Reasonable to Assume a Prime Gap of at Least 10 Before Twin Primes?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Undergrad Questions regarding Kurepa's Conjecture
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Graduate Solutions to Polignac's and Twin Prime's Conjecture
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
Verify that the integers 1949 and 1951 are twin primes
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Proof: Twin Primes Always Result in Perfect Squares
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Graduate Solution for Goldbach Conjecture
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K