Is the Union of Intersecting Connected Sets Always Connected?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rainwyz0706
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topology
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the topic of connectedness in topology, specifically examining whether the union of two connected sets that intersect the closure of one another is also connected. The original poster presents a specific case involving open and closed balls in a topological space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove the connectedness of the union of two sets and seeks hints or alternative methods. Some participants suggest assuming the union is disconnected to find a contradiction. Others propose examining the implications of the sets being expressed as disjoint unions of open sets.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different angles and reasoning about the problem. Some have provided insights into the definitions of connectedness and the implications of intersections, while others are clarifying their understanding of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of specific cases involving open and closed balls, and the original poster expresses uncertainty about how to articulate their proof. The discussion reflects a learning process with varying levels of understanding among participants.

rainwyz0706
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Let A, B be two connected subsets of a topological space X such that A intersects the closure of B .
Prove that A ∪ B is connected.

I can prove that the union of A and the closure of B is connected, but I don't know what to do next. Could anyone give me some hints or is there another way to treat this problem?

Also, for the specific case, the union of the open ball B((−1, 0), 1) and closed ball B((1, 0), 1) should be connected, right? I can see it, but I'm not sure how to word the proof. Any help is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would assume AuB is disconnected and try to find a contradiction with A intersecting the closure of B.
 
Let A \cup B = E_1 \cup E_2, with \overline{E_1} \cap E_2 = \emptyset and \overline{E_2} \cap E_1 = \emptyset
(the overline denoting closure). You need to prove one of E_1, E_2 is the empty set.
 
A space is disconnected means that it's the union of two disjoint nonempty open sets. Since we're given that A,B are connected, the only way we could possibly write A u B as a union of disjoint open sets is if A and B are in fact open and disjoint.

You can see this can't be true since A intersects the closure of B, i.e. there's a point a in A such that any neighborhood of a intersects B. But if A is open, then A contains a neighborhood of a, so that A intersects B.
 
Thanks a lot for your guys. I wasn't that clear about the concept in the first place, but now I know how to handle this type of problems.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K