Is the wigner D function a representation of SO(3)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Wigner D matrix, defined as \(\mathscr{D}\left(\hat{n},\phi \right) = \exp[-\frac{i \phi}{\hbar}\vec{J}\cdot \hat{n}]\), serves as a representation of the group SO(3) through the map \(\pi : \text{SO(3)} \to \text{GL}\left( \mathscr{H} \right)\). This map, which connects rotations \(R\left(\hat{n},\phi \right)\) to the Wigner D function, is established as a homomorphism, confirming its representation status. The discussion also raises the question of whether this representation is reducible or irreducible, referencing the foundational work of Wigner and Bargmann, and suggesting Barut and Raczka as potential resources for further exploration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Wigner D matrix and its mathematical formulation
  • Familiarity with the concepts of group representations, specifically SO(3) and SU(2)
  • Knowledge of Hilbert spaces and their properties in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of homomorphisms in the context of group theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the representation theory of SO(3) and its relation to quantum mechanics
  • Explore the mathematical properties of the Wigner D function in detail
  • Learn about the reducibility and irreducibility of representations in quantum systems
  • Read "Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics" by Barut and Raczka for comprehensive insights
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in group theory and its applications in quantum representations.

Yoran91
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I'm reading a bit about the Wigner D matrix, defined by
[itex]\mathscr{D}\left(\hat{n},\phi \right) = \exp[-\frac{i \phi}{\hbar}\vec{J}\cdot \hat{n}][/itex].

Now I'm wondering : is the map [itex]\pi : \text{SO(3)} \to \text{GL}\left( \mathscr{H} \right)[/itex] given by [itex]R\left(\hat{n},\phi \right) \mapsto \mathscr{D}\left(\hat{n},\phi \right)[/itex] a representation of SO(3) on some Hilbert space [itex]\mathscr{H}[/itex]?

I would say yes, but I have no clue on how to prove that this map is a homomorphism so that it is indeed a representation. Further, if it is a representation, is it reducible or irreducible?

Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Through the work of Wigner and Bargmann, the map [itex]\pi[/itex] you mention maps SU(2) (not SO(3)) onto some subset of the unitaries of a complex separable Hilbert space (essentially [itex]L^2 (R^3,C^{2s+1})[/itex]). This is such a standard result, that I can't think of the best book treating this subject. Barut and Raczka, maybe.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K