MHB Is there a correct way to include dimensions in economics equations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dimensional correctness of the demand function y=5000-p, highlighting that it lacks proper units. An implicit coefficient of 1.0 unit-of-price^-1 is necessary for dimensional accuracy. The conversation explores how to express price and quantity in compatible units, such as liters of water and dollars. Participants suggest that the unit of demand might be a dimensionless number or defined in specific terms like 1000 items. The importance of aligning dimensions in economic equations is emphasized for clarity and correctness.
alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
A typical demand function is y=5000-p where y is quantity demanded and p is price. But this equation isn't dimensionally correct. What am I missing?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Alexmahone said:
A typical demand function is y=5000-p where y is quantity demanded and p is price. But this equation isn't dimensionally correct. What am I missing?

Hi Alexmahone,

There's an implicit coefficient of $p$ that is apparently chosen to be $$1.0 \text{ unit-of-price}^{-1}$$, which will make it dimensionally correct.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Alexmahone,

There's an implicit coefficient of $p$ that is apparently chosen to be $$1.0 \text{ unit-of-price}^{-1}$$, which will make it dimensionally correct.

Is this what you mean?

Assuming that price is to be measured in \$, and output in litres of water, the equation would be

[math]\frac{y}{1\text{ litre of water}}=5000-\frac{p}{$1}[/math]
 
Last edited:
Alexmahone said:
Is this what you mean?

Assuming that price is to be measured in \$, and output in litres of water, the equation would be

[math]\frac{y}{1\text{ litre of water}}=5000-\frac{p}{$1}[/math]

Basically, yes.
I actually left out the unit of demand, which is presumably a dimensionless number.

Then again, suppose the unit of demand is 1000 items and the unit of price is 10000 \$, then the formula would be:
$$y=5000 \text{ kItems} - 1 \frac{\text{kItems}}{10\text{ k}\$} \cdot p$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top