MHB Is there a correct way to include dimensions in economics equations?

alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
A typical demand function is y=5000-p where y is quantity demanded and p is price. But this equation isn't dimensionally correct. What am I missing?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Alexmahone said:
A typical demand function is y=5000-p where y is quantity demanded and p is price. But this equation isn't dimensionally correct. What am I missing?

Hi Alexmahone,

There's an implicit coefficient of $p$ that is apparently chosen to be $$1.0 \text{ unit-of-price}^{-1}$$, which will make it dimensionally correct.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Alexmahone,

There's an implicit coefficient of $p$ that is apparently chosen to be $$1.0 \text{ unit-of-price}^{-1}$$, which will make it dimensionally correct.

Is this what you mean?

Assuming that price is to be measured in \$, and output in litres of water, the equation would be

[math]\frac{y}{1\text{ litre of water}}=5000-\frac{p}{$1}[/math]
 
Last edited:
Alexmahone said:
Is this what you mean?

Assuming that price is to be measured in \$, and output in litres of water, the equation would be

[math]\frac{y}{1\text{ litre of water}}=5000-\frac{p}{$1}[/math]

Basically, yes.
I actually left out the unit of demand, which is presumably a dimensionless number.

Then again, suppose the unit of demand is 1000 items and the unit of price is 10000 \$, then the formula would be:
$$y=5000 \text{ kItems} - 1 \frac{\text{kItems}}{10\text{ k}\$} \cdot p$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top