Is there a "critical temperature" for 2D Boson gas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zhang Bei
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistical physics
Zhang Bei
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Use the fact that the density of states is constant in d = 2 dimensions to show that
Bose-Einstein condensation does not occur no matter how low the temperature. (From David Tong's Lectures)
Relevant Equations
[tex]\langle N \rangle = \int_0^\infty dE\,\frac{g(E)}{z^{-1}\exp(\beta E)-1}[/tex]
The density of states of a 2D gas in a box is
g(E)=\frac{Am}{2\pi\hbar^2}\quad.

From this we can obtain
T=-\frac{2\pi\hbar^2N}{mAk_B\log (1-z)}
Inserting z \to 1 gives T_c=0. We conclude that the 2D boson gas doesn't form BEC.However, on the other hand, according to the Bose-Einstein distribution, the ground state has an expected occupancy number of
\langle n_0 \rangle =\frac{1}{z^{-1}-1}If we equate this with N, we would obtain a "critical temperature" of
<br /> T=\frac{2\pi\hbar^2N}{mAk_B\log (N+1)}<br />
For 1mol of "helium" gas in an 1m^2 area has a critical temperature of 8380K.What went wrong? Does this mean the BE distribution needs to be modified in this case? Since z can be pushed arbitrarily close to 1, aren't we always able to force n_0 to reach N?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Zhang Bei said:
From this we can obtain
T=-\frac{2\pi\hbar^2N}{mAk_B\log (1-z)}
Inserting z \to 1 gives T_c=0. We conclude that the 2D boson gas doesn't form BEC.However, on the other hand, according to the Bose-Einstein distribution, the ground state has an expected occupancy number of
\langle n_0 \rangle =\frac{1}{z^{-1}-1}If we equate this with N, we would obtain a "critical temperature" of
<br /> T=\frac{2\pi\hbar^2N}{mAk_B\log (N+1)}<br />
How did you get that last equation from the first 2?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top